I would have expected the US to be the first party to pretend the One China Policy doesn't exist. Considering how subtle Chinese politics tend to be, and that Lai himself seems to be escalating this message, I'm guessing this will be taken as a bigger provocation and insult than it might appear. The PRC might just let Lai crash Taiwan's economy until the DPP gives in to reality, if it weren't for the US looming overhead, ready to make Taiwan another unsinkable aircraft carrier in a proxy war.
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)
China
2032 readers
33 users here now
Discuss anything related to China.
Community Rules:
0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.
1: Don't go off topic.
2: Be Comradely.
3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.
讨论中国的地方。
社区规则：
零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。
一、不要跑题。
二、友善对待同志。
三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It definitely seems that squeezing Taiwan economically is the plan. I do think there are red lines that would force China to react though. For example, if DPP tries to outright declare independence or if US tries to put missiles there that can hit mainland.
Do we have a clear idea what the current buildup on the kinmen is?
My understanding is that there's nothing really major so far, but it's hard to say since US isn't being very open about it.
I've only heard "US special forces" are there. Not sure how many, but I doubt the didn't bring any toys.
I would guess China has a pretty good idea of what US brings there given that it's a national security issue.
I suggest changing the title from "Taiwan presidential office" to "Taiwan authority".
good call
Here are the documents mentioned, hosted by USC Annenberg:
- the three Joint Communiques
- Joint Communiqué of the United States of America and the People's Republic of China, February 27, 1972 (Shanghai Communiqué)
- Joint Communiqué of the United States of America and the People's Republic of China, December 15, 1978
- Joint Communiqué of the People's Republic of China and the United States of America, August 17, 1982
- Taiwan Relations Act
- the Six Assurances
1972 Joint Communiqué
12. The U.S. side declared: The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position. It reaffirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves. With this prospect in mind, it affirms the ultimate objective of the withdrawal of all U.S. forces and military installations from Taiwan. In the meantime, it will progressively reduce its forces and military installations on Taiwan as the tension in the area diminishes. [...]
1979 Joint Communiqué
2. The United States of America recognizes the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China. Within this context, the people of the United States will maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan.
3. The United States of America and the People's Republic of China reaffirm the principles agreed on by the two sides in the Shanghai Communique [...]
7. The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.
1982 Joint Communiqué
(1) [...] the United States of America recognized the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China, and it acknowledged the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China. Within that context, the two sides agreed that the people of the United States would continue to maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan. On this basis, relations between China and the United States were normalized.
Note that some have played around with the word "acknowledge" and say that to acknowledge something does not imply agreeing with it, which can technically be true, but I think that is a gross misuse of terminology with regards to important diplomatic relations.