this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15881 readers
563 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That's right it's a woman with huge breasts and a low cut dress. I swear every time I see AI hobbyists all I feel is kind-vladimir-ilyich

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Actually, the pictures are all different! See, picture 1 shows a woman with huge boobs, picture 2 shows a woman with some serious honkers, picture 3 shows a woman with a real set of badonkers, picture 4 shows a woman packin some dobonhonkeros, picture 5 shows a woman with massive dohoonkabhankoloos, picture 6 shows a woman with big old tonhongerekoogers, picture 7 shows a woman with even bigger bonkhonagahoogs, picture 8 shows a woman with humungous hungolomghnonoloughongous, and picture 9 shows a woman with notably large breasts.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Someone in that thread generated a picture based on that copypasta, and it's exactly what you'd expect (slightly nsfw): each breast is individually larger than her entire ribcage and her waist has a lower circumference than either of her thighs. Also six fingers and a neck that's coming out of one of her shoulders, because lmao AI.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great start to my isekai eldritch horror fan fiction

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

先輩、あたしのおっぱいは非ユークリッドねぇ~

[–] CloudyConvent@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

also it's of a schoolkid what the fuck

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

kiryu-slam anime was a fucking mistake

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

In one of them there is also an impressively large hat as opposed to just a ridiculously large hat.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 27 points 2 months ago
[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re not even in the artist’s style! What the fuck is the point? Fuck, I forget how fucking pornbrained the average redditor is. Why can’t they just bust already and move on with their day?

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re not even in the artist’s style!

In the last illustration - you didn't notice Giger-bra?

[–] Bay_of_Piggies@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What were we put on this earth for if not to create and share depictions of women with large knockers in a variety of mediums?

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

These things are definitely getting better and I hate them so much.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There does seem to be a lot of Klimtposting going on. Google trends says that we're in a klimt equilibrium period tho

[–] TheWurstman@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

I feel like it’s more neue deutsche Sachlichkeit vibes atm

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the male "artist," being totally sexual, unable to relate to anything beyond his own physical sensations, having nothing to express beyond the insight that for the male life is meaningless and absurd, cannot be an artist.

We are reaching levels of male loneliness "artistry" that only SCUM could have predicted power-genius

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

I wish the SCUM Manifesto would quit being so accurate so often negative

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Prompted "flowers for a hat" and none of them have that. They all have a hat with flowers, not a hand made of flowers.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

my list: Van gogh, klimt, mucha, artgerm, beksinski, art Frahm, james jean, tom bagshaw, makoto shinkai, giger.

Prompt : illustration, supermodel, flowers as a hat, (((by artist))), cleavage, hand, eyes, posing for the camera, seductive, artistic, imaginative, upvoted, aesthetic,

Why not?...

my list: random famous artists

Prompt : (((by artist))), supermodel, ~~big boobs~~, cleavage, flowers as a hat, upvoted

I left "flowers as a hat" in there because it's supposed to be - like - art.

Ninja edit: I just realized that - of course - "big boobs" isn't needed. It's a sort of default.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What I do not get about these LLM losers is that long before this image generation shit, any internet user has been free to be up to their fucking ears in various types of porn. All of that porn is pretty much guaranteed to be of better quality than this shit generated with outdated models. I would wonder if they're using it so they don't have to pay illustrators commissions, but they often aren't even generating much beyond the most vanilla shit. Is it just the novelty factor??? This does not even make sense from a cumbrain perspective.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

While I can't comment on men being so cumbrained that they get all hot and bothered over the faintest reminder that women have bodies, I can say that hitting "generate" on a generative AI frontend is like a pull on a slot machine or in a gacha, complete with the delay to build anticipation over whether what comes out of the inscrutable machine is good or trash. It's absurdly addictive, and synthesizing "push button, feel excitement" with awooga only makes it more effective (same reason gacha games do waifu shit).

Not that that makes all the "so I asked the infernal machine to show me what it would look like if my idol Norman Rockwell painted a mid century pulp waifu just for me, as a treat," shit any less cringe and funny, of course.

they often aren't even generating much beyond the most vanilla shit.

I can say with 100% certainty that that's just a selection bias because people are more likely to post tamer things and more places will host and propagate those. R34 and fetish stuff is what's driving most of the community development of hobbyist models, and the things coming out of that general effort (mostly further finetunes of the heavily-retrained SDXL branch called "Pony Diffusion XL") are also better general purpose models than the strictly general purpose SDXL finetunes.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

The generated tiddyvslot machine... desolate No scifi media predicted this cursed shit...

Also it makes sense that weird-kink people are generating highly specific images, at least that's a usecase I guess. I still hate the infernal machine, but this is info I would not have otherwise known cause shit's too cursed blob-no-thoughts

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.