this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

urbanism

22534 readers
123 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blep@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Problem with bus stops in my city is that fucking cars keep driving into them, then its months with no cover until they're replaced

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

It's insane that most bus shelters are designed to break away to keep the inhabitants of cars safer

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Have you tried violence? thinkin-lenin

[–] nocages@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the unfamiliar: "la sombrita" is the name of the corrugated metal piece on this bus stop post. It is designed to provide shade to people waiting for the bus, because the areas where these are installed have very little shade.

Due to a multitude of reasons from NIMBYs to building codes, it's difficult for the city to install anything much bigger or better than this.

If you find this interesting, you can learn more by listening to episode 545 of the podcast 99% Invisible. It's called "Shade Redux"

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poor lil smile bean city LA can't change it's own building codes. jerma-bottom

[–] nocages@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or, god forbid, use their Eminent Domain to take some private land along the sidewalk to improve life for poor people without impeding the ability of wheelchair users to navigate the city.

But that would anger the landowners, of course.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

They couldn't even finish the 710 because it would require them to domain the rich folk in the hills. So now the city still owns some homes that are going to rot below the hills and they spend (waste) money on cops to patrol/make sure no homeless can squat in them.

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] fox@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Cato Institute link

cringe

[–] Tomboys_are_Cute@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I saw that on wtyp and couldn't believe it was real. Everyone in that city's government deserves to burn in the summer sun. The only reason to make building bus shelters that complicated is to punish the homeless, it doesn't "just happen." I live over 1000km away and it still makes me mad

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is one thing to be said for it, which I think could be interpreted as sincere if you really wanna give them the benetof the doubt (I dont).

They wanted to design a busstop that also felt safe for women. Designing urban infrastructure is always difficult, because you need to balance a lot of different needs. One of these is the need for safety/perceived safety. No one will use something, if they perceive it as unsafe to do so. Another need is that for secluded spaces in public space. These two often come I to conflict, and it can be hard to solve the two.
They allegedly wanted to make something safer for people to use, that could be installed on narrow sidewalks.

However they completely fucked up, and if that was what they actually wanted to do, they could've just copied one of the many existing tried-and-true designs.
They managed to make something "safe" by virtue of it not really being there anymore. Can't feel unsafe because of poor visibility in the structure by the busstop, if the bus stop has no structure think-about-it

Alternatively they could've talked to the people making use of the bus and people wanting to make use of the bus. City planners are deathly afraid of citizen participation and it sucks, because citizens are often the most insightful with regards to their needs.

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's hard to imagine to me how a whole country can be so big. Poland is only somewhat bigger than Texas 💀

Well at least it isn't a 🔲

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American planners: we wanted to build 3 new bus lines but we were only given $3 and a mandate to ~~give it~~ contract it out to the mayor's cousin's anti-homeless company that has 50% cop employees.

[–] honeynut@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$3

"The design and prototyping was funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [...] Each prototype came to about $10,000 including design, materials and engineering, says Odbert, but the idea is that the cost for each shade would drop to about $2,000 if mass produced."

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Believe it or not those are kinds of average numbers for street furniture. Shit is pointlessly expensive due to contracting and a lack of central planning.

And the scale of what is needed to really do the job is hundreds of thousands to millions.

[–] Teekeeus@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like a project where the actual purpose was to funnel money to any consultants involved in the design

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What if I told you... yuppie car tunnels with no safety features and LED lighting? very-intelligent