this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
374 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
3302 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 102 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Could it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?

[–] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 6 months ago

I bet it's a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:

How is the subject of this paper ?
What about the style ?
You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
What's the overall comment ?

Then it's all concatenated into one blob of review.

[–] Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention it is poorly written.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)

.. not forgetting that it's poorly laid out.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

...and let's not forget also poorly written

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lads doing science to get laid, I think.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're certainly not in it for the money

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

perhaps they mean world domination?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's like they were trying to do a compliment sandwich but the best compliment they come up with is "poorly written."

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 months ago

Bun: it's poorly written

Middle: you are bad at this

Bun: it's poorly written and poorly motivated and wrong

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

I'll take what I can get

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

As a large language model, I find this paper to be poorly written.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Funny thing: it took me a while to figure out why this was noteworthy. I think that my brain must have a pre-processor for reading language written by someone for whom English is a second language, which automatically kicked in.

For better or for worse, these days the writer of this review would just put it through a GPT before sending it.

[–] kender242@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Could it be sarcastic that the review is also poorly written?

Reads like GPT, but maybe the redundant messages mirror the paper. Wonder if there is more context or it's just a meme...

... Follow shitmyrevieweressay XD

[–] SavedKriss@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It looks likee the writer of the response already put it through GPT. GPT 2 to be precise. :D

[–] Trafficone@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The dang old ESL filter makes it impossible to recognize bad English out in public. My wife got a shit that reads "force of the nature" and neither of our brains perceived the "the"

[–] Flummoxed@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You get odd phrases on your shit?? 😁

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

rimworld book descriptions

[–] boardgamesareawesome@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I thought this was a review for a bible.