this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40018 readers
2693 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

What is the pub test?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

According to this map:

https://www.cbc.ca/polopoly_fs/1.3117673.1434572717!/fileImage/httpImage/aquifer-depletion.jpg

Australia's got one aquifer in eastern Australia that's rapidly growing, and one in northwestern Australia that's being depleted at a pretty good clip. Where's the well in question?

Armadale, Australia.

checks

Southwestern Australia. Not on the aquifer map in question.

Looks like it's the Yarragadee Aquifer.

EDIT: My guess, though, is that if the water is being used for soda that people drink, it probably isn't a whole lot in relative terms. Out here in California, we've got serious aquifer depletion, but drinking water is basically a rounding error relative to other uses, like agriculture, lawns, stuff like that.

Like, I had a hamburger last night. I think it had maybe half a pound of beef.

googles

https://www.verymeaty.com/fresh-meat/beef/how-much-water-goes-into-one-pound-of-beef/

According to research, it takes approximately 1,847 gallons of water to produce just one pound of beef.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/food-water-footprint_n_5952862

According to this, a pound of tofu is 302 gallons, for the vegan crowd, if you're eating imitation beef.

But point is, given either of those routes, it's a whole lot more water than what you're gonna drink directly. You're gonna drink maybe somewhere between half a gallon and a gallon of water a day. That's vastly-outweighed by what went into just the patties on my hamburger.

EDIT2: Oh, it's definitely just being used directly as drinking water -- I didn't read closely enough. They're just bottling the water, not even adding soda flavoring.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Imitation beef is usually made from stuff like pea protein, not tofu. About 71 g/lb according to the one Google search I just did (https://www.healabel.com/pea-protein-benefits/#10-water-footprint-of-pea-protein-).

[–] JoBo 1 points 9 months ago

None of that is a reason for them being allowed to extract a scarce resource for free.