this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
593 points (98.2% liked)

News

23413 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 216 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I can't believe this is the one thing this congress has actually managed to do. We just want healthcare

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 63 points 7 months ago

I want both.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago

Healthcare!?! Who needs healthcare when Congress is giving us our god given freedom of domestic surveillance capitalism, which is the freedomist freedom that ever freedomed, you filthy communist!

So anyway, I started violating civil liberties... PEW PEW

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You'll take your overpriced medicine from your out of network pharmacy and you'll like it. At the fake markup price. And good luck getting that ultrasound, they're going to code the billing wrong so instead of it being $40 it's $1000. That's freedom talking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 156 points 7 months ago (93 children)

I wonder how many of these lawmakers will be invested in the company that swoops in and saves the American public?

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago (13 children)

For real. You know Pelosi is already investing.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If she’s investing at the same time you’re getting the information, she missed the best time to buy. She might have hedged her bets and bought early

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago (18 children)

Fun fact: Congresspeople can legally inside trade, but the rest of us cannot.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Politicians should be banned from stock market. Total conflict of interest.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Eight Democrat Senators agree with you, and cosponsored a bill in September that died at introduction.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2773/all-actions-without-amendments

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (92 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 84 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Healthcare? Nah, let's fight about it for decades and never give people anything meaningful. Education? Nah, let's make our people go neck deep into debt and still fight about it for decades. Ban TikTok? Hold my bribery, you got it. Gimme 24 hours and you got it, boss.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 7 months ago

We can't solve real issues because then we couldn't keep the American populace overworked, sick, and unable to fight back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 80 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Its all to get around passing a real privacy law with teeth.

[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago (5 children)

lmao, they don't want a real privacy law, they want to have a monopoly in spying on Americans.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just as a reminder, we have been 'fighting for 15' since 2012. But when it comes to leveraging foreign companies with bans to force them to sell to US oligarchs we can move at blazing speed through the least functional congrss in recent history. There are two very different Americas depending on how much money you have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 68 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Too bad we can't ban Meta, Twitter, and Snapchat while we're at it.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

won’t happen

Where do you think the FBI gets their domestic terrorist intel from 😂

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 62 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Even though i dont think banning tiktok is a good idea purely because of the concept, those boards are funny. "Tiktok changed my life for the better"

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They're also all printed, and with the same font. I'm assuming it's a stock photo, but if that's from a real protest I don't trust those protestors.who the hell gets a protest sign printed?

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 32 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Its because the company literally paid shills to stump for them in person, call Congress, etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 50 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Do Facebook and Twitter next.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Most of social media are an actual threat considering the fact what data do they collect.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

Yes US needs privacy laws, not just banning one of the many data-mining social networks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tulth@sh.itjust.works 40 points 7 months ago (6 children)

can we ban or move YouTube shorts elsewhere while we are at it?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"The Chinese oligarchs are taking over!" - US oligarchs probably

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

US oligarchs most definitely

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 37 points 7 months ago (8 children)

This comment section is astounding.

If you think it’s good that congress passed a ban of a social media platform tied to a bill funding two foreign wars you’re either a fed or delusional.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Seriously. The real solution is comprehensive privacy protection and consumer information export controls for all companies operating within the US.

This whole thing is just going to give an American company the capability to use Tik Tok to spy on people and control information, which is barely better.

And then they'll likely sell the data to China anyway. Data brokers exist and make a fuck ton of money on us.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 32 points 7 months ago (18 children)

If social media apps exist to slurp up as much user info as possible, and they do, then it makes sense to be concerned about the government that they're subject to.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (19 children)

I probably shouldnt be celebrating this but I am. I fucking despise Tiktok with a passion, I hate its users, its creators, I hate the short form content trend it started and its algorithm based content delivery systems that every other app copied but worse, I hate the sexualisation of minors and peddling that content to pedos, I hate the clout chasing in general, I hate tiktok trends and "challenged". and I hate the general brainrot it has caused.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (20 children)

What are you celebrating, exactly? TikTok isn't going away, it's just going to be sold to American investors.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Will there be a TikTok dance on TikTok that covers this event?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

The Tiktok dance to end all Tiktok dances. Literally.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nooooo only I should collect data of the entire world!

They never got over Snowden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (4 children)

They may just pull out of the US completely

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

They'd be right to do so.

The way this got passed was criminally sleazy. And there's no reason for a foreign company to hand over its IP to some Wall Street thugs.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I have mixed feelings. Like I’m glad we’re funding Ukraine, angry we’re finding Israel, and mixed about TikTok. I dislike the app, but that’s no reason to ban something. I think all social media has the issues associated with it except one: a foreign country controls the algorithm. Also this is standard policy for foreign companies in China and turnabout is fair play.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It seems like a lot of people think moves like this are about actual national security like congress claims,

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So the next nine months will be TikTok pushing pro Trump propaganda 24/7, mobilising the youth against Biden, only to be forced to sell by Trump anyway because everyone who hops into bed with populists gets fucked regardless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

Weak, totalitarian strategy. If we’re worried about China taking over, becoming China is not the right way to fight that.

And pretending that forcing American ownership cuts out China’s influence is foolish.

load more comments
view more: next ›