this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
375 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39127 readers
3250 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you rephrased my question

No I didn't.

this shop has security cameras, insurance, and other reasonable protective and preventative methods, they get robbed (which still result in a financial hit). Are they victims?

Yes, just like if a company properly offboards their employees, they would be victims if a disgruntled employee hacked them in retaliation.

But that's not what happened. This "shop" doesn't have locks on the doors. It's hard to feel bad for them when they left the door wide open.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

corporations are not people, they are soulless, for-profit enterprises that will, for damn sure, abuse and exploit any one and any thing they can in the name of profit. They don’t get the defense of “victim blaming”.

So you agree with me that corporations can be victims, which is what I was originally responding to and you originally challenged.

You're now saying that if proper precautions are not taken, you can't be considered a victim.

This is classic victim blaming, which is my point. If I leave my wallet on the table at a bar and someone steals it, despite me being an idiot I'm still the victim of a crime. It's not my fault, it's the fault of the person who stole it.

Just like with the company in the OP, they are idiots for not taking proper precautions against malicious actors, but it's still the fault of the malicious actor.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Corporations can't be victims of victim blaming

So you agree that they can be victims of victim blaming

That user that tagged you as "purposeful idiot" was fucking spot on.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Make up quotes, call me an idiot based on them not making any sense. Classic.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Wow, you're doing it again. Amazing.