this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
1209 points (98.3% liked)

memes

10428 readers
2361 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 202 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Pretty sure the answer is just "40 minutes" and it is a question to make someone think about what they are doing rather than automatically solve every task.

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 85 points 5 months ago (5 children)

But it’s still wrong, though, as the 9th is about 70 minutes.

There’s even a myth saying that the 9th was the determinant for the length of the original CD.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 70 points 5 months ago

That's how long it usually takes since usually it's played with about 200 players

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

IIRC the speed of the 9th symphony is somewhat controversial because what markings we have on original sheetmusic are significantly faster than it's normally played.

Symphony music in general is going to vary a decent bit depending on what bpm(s) the conductor is choosing.

[–] addie 11 points 5 months ago

Any decent conductor is going to to vary the beat based on how long it takes for sound to fill the venue in question. Beethoven's choices for the music halls in Vienna might have made sense then, but not so much today.

One of the things that's always annoyed the conductors that I've worked with is that we always ignore the dynamics in his music. Beethoven's markings are expressive, subtle. And we always play his stuff louder than indicated.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I'd like to think it's a really clever question about making people verify what's written before them, rather than taking everything at face value and absolute fact.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 4 points 5 months ago
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I'm glad we got the length handled. Those CDs that looked like a sub sandwich were so awkward to handle...

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is similar to something I assumed right before I had a long argument with a high school physics teacher. We ended up agreeing that he just didn't really care.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you nominate him for teacher of the year?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yes but he didn’t really care.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this seems like an obvious trick question.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago

I remember something similar from a kids riddle book like 30 years ago about cooking stuff in an oven

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or 80 and it’s a question to learn extracting information

Like saying “let pi = 3” the point isn’t that pi is equal to 3. It’s that you can take that information and solve the rest of the expression

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

There isn't enough information to get 80 minutes.