this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
279 points (98.3% liked)

News

23376 readers
2437 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Retail chains like TJX, the parent company of TJ Maxx and Marshalls, are equipping some store employees with body cameras to deter shoplifting and improve safety. This is part of a growing trend in the retail industry, as stores respond to an increase in organized retail theft and violence against workers. However, some criminologists and worker advocates argue that body cameras are unlikely to be an effective deterrent and that retailers should focus on improving training, staffing, and other safety measures instead. There are also concerns that the body camera footage could be misused, such as to monitor and discourage union organizing. Overall, the implementation of body cameras in retail is a complex issue with pros and cons that retailers will need to carefully consider.

Summarized by Kagi Universal Summarizer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'd hate that as an employee. Imagine knowing that every time you talk to a coworker, it's recorded. Every time you sit for a few minutes to reset, it's recorded. Every time you check your phone, it's on camera.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

this is the real reason why they're doing it.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Seriously.

Like if you think mass-shoplifting hurts them- that shit's already baked into the price of goods being sold before it ever happened.

Unionizing will hurt their profits far, far more than shoplifters ever will.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

(Fuck poverty and those who promote and embrace it)


shoplifting [is] already baked into the price of goods being sold

Tomorrow’s recipe adjusted based on yesterday’s shrink? 👨‍🍳

Question assumes a greedy entity will refuse to allow reduction of its profit margin.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Tomorrow’s recipe adjusted based on yesterday’s shrink? 👨‍🍳

Nope. They have fancy overpriced mathnerds (“actuaries”) that build models to predict future shrinkage and price that into today’s prices.

The shrinkage is paid for before it ever goes out the door. Probably, before it ever came in the door in the first place.

These mathnerds that work for these corporations are some of the best in the business of risk modeling. Second only to insurance companies.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Them actuaries 🤓

Just called all my friends and we decided to start a TJX shoplifter training school franchise. If we’re successful this year, do we stand a chance at adding a penny to prices next year?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

My magic 8 ball says “most likely they get arrested before that happens”.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

already baked into the price of goods

I’m probably substituting the specific example here, but once somebody grabbed a huge stack of napkins they weren’t even going to be able to eventually use. When confronted about waste, they replied:

They’re already made!

It’s wild I can still remember this anecdote. I mean, after 20 years?! You can imagine how much it bothered me. No, not a few napkins. The logic, or lack thereof.

(It’s self evident the napkins were previously manufactured - they currently exist in front of our eyes!)

Taking one extra napkin means napkins will be re-ordered one napkin sooner. Much easier to defend: “sorry, it’s just one napkin.“

We need to unionize so bad, yes, but the particular argument being made re: shrink struck me as totally illogical. Surprising because it sounds like you really know your stuff! So maybe I’m missing something. Thanks for diving into the smallest thing with me here.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’ve worked in contract security for too long.

Not with retailers. We charge too much for them, and they really wouldn’t like my recommendations.

And take it from a manager- Unions are vital. Corporations would ratfuck their own mother if it would increase their profits by a buck.

But their attitude is a bit more like “shrinkage is unavoidable.” So they plan to mitigate its effects before it ever happens. Unfortunately the easiest and most cost effective way to do it is to bake it in and pass that cost onto customers.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Most retail stores and restaurants already have cameras everywhere. I had a boss who would sit at home watching the feed and then call the store to yell at us when he thought we were burning sandwiches.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

...everytime you go ~~to the bathroom~~ to jack-it.