this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
131 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22270 readers
278 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 37 points 5 months ago (3 children)

oh neat. another moment in amerikkkan democracy where one unelected judge has the unilateral power to sentence trump to between 0 and 136 years in jail. the choice has profound implications. very cool situation we have here. very popular control of the government for things to develop this way.

[–] footfaults@hexbear.net 27 points 5 months ago
[–] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Wow there's no higher court or appellate review or precedent or professional norms constraining a new york trial judge that's crazy

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

well the really fun part is that those guys tend to be even more conservative and even less accountable.

but i get it, no jokes, the bourgeois justice system does not deserve to be satirized for its relative unaccountability to public scrutiny and review.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Being sarcastic is not sufficient to be satire

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What are laws for if not for jailing ooosition figures?

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i'd personally hit the full 136 just as a bit

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

Well yhea. You cant chiken out at this point.