this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22284 readers
227 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On this day in 2013, Turkish protesters began occupying Gezi Park to oppose its demolition, an act with led to widespread protests and strikes with approximately 3,500,000 participants, 22 deaths, and more than 8,000 injuries.

The wave of civil unrest across Turkey began after the park occupation was violently evicted by police, who used to tear gas, pepper spray, and water cannons to try and break up the protests, injuring more than one hundred people and hospitalizing a journalist.

The protest quickly grew in size - by May 31st, 10,000 gathered in Istiklal Avenue. In June, the protests became national in scope and transcended any particular demographic or political ideology. Among the wide range of concerns brought by protesters were issues of freedom of the press, expression, and assembly, as well as the alleged political Islamist government's erosion of Turkey's secularism.

Millions of Turkish football fans, normally divided by intense sports rivalry, marched in unity against the government. Protesters displayed symbols the environmentalist movement, rainbow banners, depictions of Che Guevara, different trade unions, and the PKK and its leader Abdullah Öcalan.

On June 4th, Taksim Dayanışması (Taksim Solidarity) issued a set of demands that included the preservation of Gezi Park, an end to police violence, the right to freedom of assembly, and an end to the privatization of public spaces. Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç met the group on June 5th and rejected these demands.

Erdoğan blamed the protests on "internal traitors and external collaborators", demonizing his political opposition as the former. Despite the popular mobilization, Erdoğan remained in power and no major concessions were won from the government.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lerios@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

does anyone have any sources on that that "china invited everyone to see the 'uyghur camps', the west refused, but all the muslim countries went and said it was chill" thing? and/or adrian zenz being fucking insane? my lib friend has turned out to be suprisingly open to being chinapilled, but the whole ~genocide~ bullshit is a big stumbling block

suprisingly enough, trying to find things that counter US propaganda through google isn't working out well thonk

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

There's this map from axios (yuck) but the article is dogshit and doesnt say what really matters

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

Strong reccomend for the UN final report on Xinjiang.

[–] Sephitard9001@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

Show him Zenz's own report where he says "this is our best evidence" and presents data suggesting that 80% of new IUD insertions occurred in Xinjiang. Then look at the article Zenz cites for this data to show him how it absolutely does not reflect that michael-laugh

[–] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I would ask them why they think china wants to genocide the Uighurs, what the point is, and how that goal lines up with them being historically exempt from population control like the one child policy or the fact that their population has been, and still is, steadily increasing for decades. Does China want to wipe them out but is just very bad at genocide? Or maybe... they don't want to do a genocide