this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
1234 points (95.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12745 readers
4902 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 102 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Aside from the thousands of species we killed in the process

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

It's a recurrent theme in the history of the world you know, thousands, hundreds of thousands, tens of millions of species killed, never to be seen again.

No species ever lasts that long.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There have been many extinction events, and we won’t be the first “nature based extinction event” the planet has seen either.

Just one of the dumber ones.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Others have been fairly random. GRBs sterilizing half the planet, asteroid impacts, simple microbiological species fighting for resources whilst unknowingly making their environments unlivable, etc., etc.

In this case, the writing has been on the wall for decades, completely preventable, but here we are barrelling into it head first none-the-less. Dumber indeed.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hardly. We conserve when we want to.

The problem is that not everyone shares the same values, and so there are people who are willing to let some species go in exchange for a more comfortable lifestyle (with "more comfortable" in some cases meaning "not starving to death"). Values aren't objective.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sorry, I was absolutely dehumanizing and generalizing us as a species. Individually, you're absolutely right, but the people who need to make the tough decisions to save us all won't make them and will selfishly take us all into the end with them. Differentiating the subjective opinions and values, at the end of the day, doesn't really matter.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No species ever lasts that long.

Sharks enter the thread.

Awkward silence ensues

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Shark species go extinct all the time. New shark species arise.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except for these species, classified as living fossils:

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Why does the cow shark description say it’s unique in having six and sometimes seven gill slits compared to all other sharks having five. Then the frilled shark says it has six gill slits.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They're both part of the Hexanchiformes order, which are seven gill sharks. So the cow shark article is wrong, there are two surviving families with more than five gills.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you, I typically default to assuming I don’t understand or I’m confused when reading up things outside of my wheelhouse. I enjoyed reading up on the sharks you shared! I was trying to decide which one I would want to be if I could decide while laying in bed this morning. Felt silly but fuck it, I’m old, it’s nice to dream.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 6 months ago

I hope you picked Goblin shark. You get to be "ugly" and don't give a fuck and outlive your enemies lives anyways.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago

Terry the Trilobite too.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We are committing a mass extinction on Earth's life, there will be a geological record one day of where life suddenly fell off.

And what's really wild to think about is that while tragic to us and our perspective of the beauty of the world... in the larger picture, it will still be utterly insignificant to Earth's history. The next million years will see massive portions of life die off, climates will change, new species will emerge and grow into new ecosystems, and there will be an entirely new set of fauna and flora, and humans will be a distant memory, a rust-colored line on the strata.

And that coming million years? Also a blink of an eye in Earth's history. A fraction of a fraction of our planet's history of life's abundance and drama. All the life we see around us represents a sliver of a fraction of a fraction of Earth's biological history. It's so, SO much bigger than any of us can imagine and it should have the effect of humbling us.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago

dont forget about our deep space probes, pioneer, and voyager.

Those will still exist without us. A drifting reminder of our pitiful existences, hurtling through the vast emptiness of space, hoping to find something capable of discovering it.

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

250 millions years ago, there was a mass extinction that killed 95% of life on earth.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah and we should maybe NOT CAUSE ANOTHER ONE wtf