this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
472 points (92.3% liked)

World News

39127 readers
3145 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Germany actually spends money to stop Denmark producing power on windy days when prices get too low. Instead we could be making hydrogen and storing it in so many creative ways

Its 'free' anyway so there should be no concern about how much of it is lost in conversion

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nothing is free. Equipment costs money and time to build, operate, maintain, and repair.

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The equipment to harvest energy, is built already and is practically being held inactive, because companies can't make money off it. If we could invest in ways to convert even some part of that excess energy into energy that could be sold later, I can't see why this should not be feasible.

The way I see it, companies are interested in making money on energy and not supplying affordable energy

[–] SpongyAneurism@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we'll get to the point. This news just shows us, that solar power can really be very impactful, even in not-so-sunny Germany. And that we've reached a turning point, where we can no longer 'just' put up more solar panels, but also start developping systems to store this excess energy in an economically feasible manner.

But actually, that's nothing very new either. At least for home owners, who just put solar panels on their roofs, also investing in battery storage to use most of the produced energy themselves has been the economic strategy for a few years, since the price gap between what you got for putting energy into the grid, and what you had to pay for taking energy out of the grid was the only thing left that (economically) incentivized people to install solar power ever since the so called "Einspeisevergütung" subsidies have been dropped.

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 1 points 6 months ago

I imagine solar panels and wind turbines will become a lot more expensive when batteries (and other energy storage options) become available, as they will be a lot more useful. It only makes sense to build as many as possible before the storage option become available