this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
214 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22758 readers
485 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's not "computer science", you're talking about programming or software engineering, which are workers building what computer scientists have figured out. There are very few computer scientists. They are basically specialized mathematicians. Think Dijkstra. Google has most of them chained up in a basement somewhere writing sharding algorithms or something. It's confusing because many programmers get CS undergrad degrees, but they are starting to make "software engineering" degrees.

It's true that CS doesn't use the scientific method, but neither do library science, "scientific socialism", etc. Popper isn't the be-all end-all.

[–] facow@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough I had been considering deleting/rewriting my comment for a similar reason. Point still stands if you replace CS for SWE

[–] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

yeah SWE is not science, we're not discovering anything we're just building