this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
617 points (77.5% liked)

Political Memes

5487 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Why is the the voters obligation to vote for shitty candidates rather than in the candidates to earn the vote?

It's our obligation as voters, as people entrusted with political power, to do what we can to steer our polity towards the least destructive and immoral path that we can.

"JOE BIBEN HASN'T EARNED MY VOTE" doesn't mean jack fucking shit. The point of a citizen's duty is not to suck off the right people - it's to protect one's fellow citizens, and ideally, members of other polities as well.

Voting isn't a fucking judgement of who's moral enough to go to democracy fucking heaven - voting is a judgement of who is least objectionable in steering the future of the polity - including considering the likelihood of success.

Sorry that using political power responsibly is such a foreign concept to you.

Biden is looking at a close race and the majority of voters want a cease fire.

The majority of voters want a cease-fire. You want to tell me what the majority of voters want the US to do to achieve a ceasefire?

Most US voters are not in favor of more stringent terms than what Biden has already proposed.

This idea that the US electorate is as left as the Fediverse is just... fucking bizarre.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

You dont get those changes by just blindly voting against the Republicans. You have to actually pressure your candidates into supporting what you want. Companies and lobbiests are able to do this with giant sacks of cash. Normal people do it by protesting and making demands of their officials to force a response. Showing nothing but contempt for anti-war protests is always a bad look for a president running for reelection.

Biden has all the leverage on Israel to make them stop the killing. He can threaten to pull military aid, send in US forces to distribute humanitarian aid, or put sanctions on Israel. All of those would stop the killing, making people angry at the US response willing to vote for Biden, paving a path for his re-election. Why are you so against him forcing Israel to stop the genocide if it is his only path to victory?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because it's not his only path to victory, and it's not even certain that it IS a path to victory. A majority of DEMOCRATS, much less the general public, still approve of the current level of support to Israel or support INCREASED support to Israel.

Do I want Biden to pull out of Israel? Yes. Do I understand why the strategic political reasons why it's not being done, other than Biden being an old dinosaur? Also yes. Do I think that welcoming Trump into the White House will improve the matter? Fuck no.

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Those voters who approve of funding Israel's genocide should really suck it up and vote for Biden even if he slashes funding. After all they aren't crazy "tankies" who would dare withhold their vote because they don't approve of what he's doing.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Then they deserve what they get!

If the majority would rather side with supporting genocidal actions, rather than peace, than America deserves to burn

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tell me you're white and know you're not gonna be the one who actually burns without telling me you're white and know you're not gonna be the one who actually burns.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're saying that you are ok with Israel slaughtering Palestinians so long as you can continue your standard of living. "Never Again" doesn't have a secret clause saying we shouldn't stop genocide if it means people may be harmed in the process.

You don't want Trump to take over the US and institute his fascist policies? You should be leaning on the Democrats to actually try and stop him, rather than going after those who are trying to actually stop fascism as it pops up.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"We think any amount of genocide is unacceptable, that's why we think it is imperative to threaten the democrats with the possibility of letting more genocide happen here too if they don't stop supporting genocide, and shut up it's not supporting genocide when we do it because we're right!"

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

The Israeli government has said they want to remove every Palestinian from Gaza and the West Bank. There is literally no more genocide that is able to happen right now

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then they deserve what they get!

If the majority would rather side with supporting genocidal actions, rather than peace, than America deserves to burn

Thanks for going mask off.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth -1 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Yeah mask off.

To all the people supporting genocidal actions, we do no give a fuck what you think.

When you decide that you are not ok with sending more bombs to continue killing children then we can talk.

Until then I hope you all experience exactly what you want other people to.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (11 children)

No. There is no moral responsibility to vote for someone who hasn't earned that vote. That's a construct meant to remove the politician's responsibility to their constituents. An Astroturf by the donor class to protect their influence. Stop doing their work for them. They don't care about you beyond how much money you can make them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago

The point of a citizens duty is not to suck off the right people

spends multiple paragraphs over multiple comments explaining why their entire political ideology is that its a citizens duty to suck off the right people