this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
823 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54746 readers
268 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In what appears to be an escalating incursion into a user’s digital privacy, a collective of film companies continue to implore the court to compel Reddit to surrender its users’ personal details. This move is part of an ongoing piracy liability case against Internet Service Providers. Reddit, however, steadfastly resists, staunchly defending its users’ rights to anonymous speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mtnwolf@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reddit understands it's value is in content to sell. If reddit starts ratting out it's free content creators, they lose value. Their actions are a profit calculation, not some noble stand to protect privacy.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You’d think they’d have considered that these past few months in relation to, …other user concerns.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

You are the product, not the paying customer. That means you are cattle.

The farmer will build a fence to protect the cattle from predators, because it is in the interest of the farmer to preserve the cattle. But come payday, the farmer will gladly butcher the cattle for profit.

Social media users in the you-are-the-product buisness model are no different. Your user experience will be catered to you to cultivate the user base. But your experience will be actively ruined the instant it benefits the paying customer, I.e. if that means the paying customer, advertisers, will get what they want (promotion).

[–] mtnwolf@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The difference is people generally don't care about a change if it doesn't inconvenience them beyond their tolerance threshold. Losing access to 3rd party apps? Bad to some, but probably the profit of the move will exceed the cost. (their hope) But get a rep for ratting out your posters to authorities and it suddenly becomes very personal for more people.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 1 year ago

Based on zero data and just my impression, it seems like only a minority of us were actually willing to leave over it. They might make more money money from addicts using the ad app or buying gold than they lose from reduced content creation.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

They said the quiet part out loud during the API fiasco. They are planning on selling the data to AI companies, it's why old.reddit has to die.

Calling it all now (although in fairness it's basically already public information, even if everyone doesn't seem to believe it).

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

It's one and the same.