this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
661 points (97.1% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
2548 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8569504

How is the hydrogen made?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 254 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (50 children)

To save you all a google: it's made from natural gas, at a pretty significant energy loss compared to just burning the gas. It generates about 4 times more co2 than burning diesel.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 75 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Time to arm the swans and Canada geese, too.

[–] JoBo 68 points 7 months ago (5 children)

That is true of all colours of hydrogen other than green (and possibly natural stores of 'fossil' hydrogen if they can be extracted without leakage).

Green hydrogen is better thought of as a battery than a fuel. It's a good way to store the excess from renewables and may be the only way to solve problems like air travel.

How hydrogen is transforming these tiny Scottish islands

That's not to say it's perfect. Hydrogen in the atmosphere slows down the decomposition of methane so leaks must be kept well below 5% or the climate benefits are lost. We don't have a good way to measure leaks. It's also quite inefficient because a lot of energy is needed to compress it for portable uses.

And, of course, the biggest problem is that Big Carbon will never stop pushing for dirtier hydrogens to be included in the mix, if green hydrogen paves the way.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 months ago

Storing hydrogen is also really hard. It needs to be kept extremely cold, and when it isn't, it tends to pass right through most storage units.

But as a local battery, it can be very useful. Or for applications in large machinery where batteries aren't a useful option yet.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If the leaks of hydrogen should be kept under 5%, we don't have a good track record of keeping gas leaks under control anyway...

https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw?si=Kn-uO64U4X5B_szD

[–] JoBo 15 points 7 months ago

Yes. I'm not watching a video but it is a serious problem, especially as hydrogen degrades metals and finds its way out anyway. The private sector cannot be trusted to self-regulate nor the government to meaningfully regulate.

Trying very hard not to succumb to nihilism here ...

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or, in other words, the hydrogen economy is prone to bubbles and explosions here and there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

And better yet, if the excess heat can be used. Last Friday i heard a sales rep from a (green) hydrogen company describe their solution as a heating solution that produce hydrogen at an energy storage conference. Seems fair to me😊

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I really don’t get why hydrogen remains popular. Hydrogen is significantly less efficient than lithium batteries in storing electricity. There are currently dozens of technologies on the way for improving batteries beyond what’s possible with lithium. So what’s the market potential for green hydrogen again?

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It wins by a huge margin on the energy to weight ratio. In scenarios where weight doesn't matter it's dumb, but there is potential in places like air travel where it does make sense.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago

I had to scroll way too far to find this - surely the main pro/con if hydrogen.

Storage was an issue in the past. Is it better now?

[–] JoBo 5 points 7 months ago

Batteries are too heavy for many applications (including, arguably, cars).

That doesn't make hydrogen the only solution but it is at least a currently available solution. I posted a link about why the Orkneys (population 23k) are producing hydrogen and switching much of their transport to it: they have so much wind the UK (population 70m) national grid can't take all the power they generate from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Oh great, and I was wondering why some of our policians were pushing hydrogen cars as an alternative to electric cars, despite even the car industry telling them to shut the fuck up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Stop Doing Marketing for Fossil Fuel Companies by Calling it "Natural" Gas Challenge

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago

Finally, a correct answer within the context.

[–] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Didn‘t we have a process to electrically synthesize hydrogen out of water?

[–] greyw0lv@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Electrolysis, it works but it takes a lot of energy to produce, so burning hydrogen from this would be a fools errand.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you spend almost same amount of energy to split water compared to heat produced by burning hydrogen?

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably more because of entropy: Nature's IRS.

The only way for electrolysis to be greener than fossil fuels is to use renewable energy sources like wind or solar. It wouldn't produce enough to gain much market share in any case. So the oil lobby is pushing to derive it from petroleum, because they're Captain Planet villains.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

That's why I said almost.

The only way for electrolysis to be greener than fossil fuels is to use renewable energy sources like wind or solar.

Yep. Basically gas battery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)