this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
372 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2460 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app's founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What's next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app's founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle's photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app's full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 55 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This thread was fated to be a dumpster fire from the instant it was created

Edit: 6 people dont seem to understand what an unholy combination it is to merge: Transphobia, Misandry, AI, and somewhat silly names on the internet

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll explain my down-vote as per your edit: people don't like thread meta discussions. It's unproductive, mean and frankly just lazy. Keep that on reddit.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Lmao nah, I think I'll keep commenting according to my own values and you can keep commenting according to yours. Thank you for explaining your downvote though!

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're free to do whatever you want just pointing out that down votes don't necessarily mean you are being bullied by bigots or whatever you're imagining so conclusively here. Your comment might just suck 🙄

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Did I say I was being bullied? And tbh, if we're gonna use up and downvotes to determine whether or not my comment sucks, it definitely doesnt look like it sucks

Edit: I imagine its one of my more upvoted comments because I'm not alone in entering this thread, seeing the dumpster fire the comment section was in, looking at the contents of the thread starter and then being like "Yeah, ok, that makes sense"

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're conflating subjective and objective here my dude

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I dont think those words mean what you think they do

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you think what you think you think

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

This back and forth has gotten so silly I cant even be defensive/annoyed anymore, this is legitimately funny now xD