this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
87 points (89.9% liked)

World News

40408 readers
3760 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An "alliance of authoritarian powers" is working more closely together against Western democracies, the head of Nato has warned.

Jens Stoltenberg told the BBC that Russia, Iran, China and North Korea are increasingly aligned.

He also said he was confident allies of the Nato military alliance would agree a long-term funding deal for Ukraine by July.

The Nato chief explained: "China is propping up the Russian war economy, delivering key parts to the defence industry, and in return, Moscow is mortgaging its future to Beijing."

Russia was providing technology to Iran and North Korea in return for ammunition and military equipment, he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No argument here she is hopelessly compromised when it comes to the tories

After the election I expect her to start banging the bring back Boris drum

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’d like to join the debate by agreeing with both of you.

What I would add, is that I think she is a Government. lapdog - and I think we’ll see her fluttering her eyelashes at Starmer, when the time comes.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll wade in with a "she's not lying here, so how does she benefit by saying it?"

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She gets better access to Ministers for interviews etc, the odd scoop etc.

You don’t go far in political reporting with out good access to government. You don’t get (and keep) good access to government people without winning their favour.

In return for carrying the party message, she gets thrown the odd no-mark (or disobedient MP) To bully on tv once in a while, to enhance her credibility.

She’s by no means alone. It’s just the rules of the game.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks for spelling it out, I'm fairly new to UK politics. I'm beginning to think I might be too plain spoken to ever really understand it. I feel like my kid, watching those penguin slide toys at the market. What fun, look at it go, whee. 🙂

[–] JoBo 2 points 10 months ago

That's sort of correct. But she would have devoted her entire life to getting Corbyn out of office if 2017 had turned out differently. She's a Tory through and through, and so is fucking Starmer.