this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
547 points (92.0% liked)

World News

38987 readers
2261 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It was no April Fool’s joke.

Harry Potter author-turned culture warrior J.K. Rowling kicked off the month with an 11-tweet social media thread in which she argued 10 transgender women were men — and dared Scottish police to arrest her.

Rowling’s intervention came as a controversial new Scottish government law, aimed at protecting minority groups from hate crimes, took effect. And it landed amid a fierce debate over both the legal status of transgender people in Scotland and over what actually constitutes a hate crime.

Already the law has generated far more international buzz than is normal for legislation passed by a small nation’s devolved parliament.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 7 months ago (3 children)

that's how you know scotland's hate crime law is good.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be honest it's not. It's extreme and the content of the bill itself breaks the very law it describes.

Basically if you say any comment about a singled out group and anyone over heard you and takes offence you can br prosecuted.

So you're in your own home, on the phone, talking about how all black guys have massive dicks. A neighbour overhears, gets offended and reports you. Even if you don't get arrested, prosecuted or go to jail that incident goes on your permanent record.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

that's literally not what the bill is...

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Except for the fact that Scottish police already came out to say that she wouldn't be charged for recent comments.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because it doesn't mean what the screeching idiots think it means.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

that's never stopped them. Jordan Peterson got famous by misinterpreting a canadian law to mean people would get jailed for misgendering trans people.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

because she didn't actually say anything that should could be charged for. jk rowling just was desperate to be a martyr.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Israely bombs sometimes hit Hamas, not just civilians. Does not make them good. Just like (supposedly) doing a good thing in this one case does not make it a good law.

And it was confirmed Rowling won't even be prosecuted. Because of course these kind of laws don't apply to the rich and famous hatemongers. They apply to the poor schmuck making a bad taste joke.