So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol

Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings.

And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be.

Didn't read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content.