this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
454 points (97.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3534 readers
1122 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So you're saying you want a media company that has a monopoly?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that's a kind of shitty take. The point they're making, that IP hoarding is making streaming fuck awful, is correct. They had a time in the recent past where that wasn't the case and were trying to make an argument for why that should be again.

Content being centralized doesn't require a monopoly, it requires the separation between streaming services and IP creators (like early Netflix). That would disincentivize the IP hoarding without requiring a monopoly.

Ya know, like movie theaters or video rental stores (when those existed). By allowing for vertical integration, you get Disney Movie Theaters, which only show Disney movies, and that blows (which is why any IP streaming service blows). Movie theaters, instead, show every movie coming out right now and that's how streaming services should be. That way, the only way to compete is with app quality and price. Ya know, things customers actually give a fuck about.

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I understand that the first person didn't want a media monopoly, but your explanation and examples with movie theaters and rental stores really made the difference clear.

[–] Landmammals@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I can listen to pretty much any song I want on Spotify. Does Spotify have a monopoly?

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think there are a ton of valid arguments that they have far too much control of the music streaming market. At least enough power to affect the licensing costs and artist incomes.

There have been more than a few anti trust claims made against them.

Do I think they're too big and have an outsized influence? Yes. Definitely.

At the moment at lot of what they've done have benefited consumers though, but that doesn't mean that will always be true.

Never trust a profit driven business to work in your best interest.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Streaming services should compete on quality of the platform, pricing and features, not exclusives. If every tv series and movie were available on every platforms, prices would drop and quality would increase, as the platforms try and be the best, it's the contrary of monopoly because people can freely choose. Now they don't care about being the best, they try and get exclusive rights for something you like watching so you have no other (legal) way to do it, right now it's already a monopoly, a segregated one, but still a monopoly, because you have no choice.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why on earth would capitalist companies do that though? That would guarantee most companies would not realize shareholder value.

Who gives a shit what they do? Piracy has never been easier or better than it is right now. Instead of being annoyed at their stupidity start teaching people you know how to use vpns and torrents.

Media companies used to be terrified of torrents. Now they don't care anymore. It would nice to get that back

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How much money does Netflix spend on trash series just to hope to get some exclusive? And how much money does Paramount+ spend on a broken platform full of issues?

Maybe if netflix spent those money on acquiring more IP, and producers like Paramount gave their IP to different streaming, they would make more money? I don't have an answer to this question because it's of course very complicated, what I'm saying is it doesn't have to be like this.

How platforms are now is after a continuous growth over half a decade, it's probably not sistainable to keep the same price with the same business model, so somwthing will have to change eventually

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'm not criticizing your rationale or anything. I'm just trying to get across how far from what you think things "should" be like and how they really are.

Imagine the infuriating arguments you have with boomer/geriatric family at Thanksgiving. except they're in charge and have all the money and you're constantly fighting their shortsighted thinking, racist bias, greed and ignorance..

That's how decisions are made for these platforms.

We're absolutely going ro see more and more ads on for-pay platforms because one of these geriatric greed monsters saw that another of their cohort made their hoard bigger last quarter so now they want that. Like a toddler who failed the marshmallow test. They don't about your arguments. They have all the money so their clearly know much more than you.

I certainly won't claim special insider knowledge as some anon on the Internet.. but if you knew someone in the Industry you'd get similar stories.