this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
578 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 168 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I'd recommend avoiding Google for web searching. Duckduckgo has been a good alternate for me for about 5 years now. I've heard that Bing is a good alternate, even though its a Microsoft service. ChatGPT is also a good option to compliment web searches, though I'd recommend getting a second result from another service if looking up an answer to a question, but when doing general questions/suggestions it can outperform a web search in both detail and ability to refine/filter.

Google is just a ranked ad delivery service based on an abused and gamed SEO system, it's fucking awful for delivering useful links.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There used to be a search engine called Dogpile that would aggregate results from a bunch of other search engines (so you'd see like, the top 5 or 10 results from each of the other engines), which was actually really rad for a long time. (It looks like they're still around, but are just a shitty normal search engine, now.)

It'd be neat to have something like that again, especially if it excluded sponsored links and highlighted results that were shared in the "top" results from more of the other services (and let you specify which search engines it was aggregating from).

[–] BobaFett26@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You might be interested in SearXNG: https://docs.searxng.org/

Edit: spelling

[–] DrNeurohax@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I JUST started using SearXNG and have been also googling the same terms to see how they compare.

So far (less than a week), SearXNG has had what i was looking for in the first 5 links every time. Googled result was either below the scroll or I gave up. Maybe only a couple dozen tests, but it wasn't even close.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ooh, I love this! Thanks for the link!

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think Hotbot did that back in the 90's, and it's relaunched (well, the name and domain have been put to use again) as a privacy focused search that combines an AI style question/answer style system as well as traditional link list result. https://www.hotbot.com

[–] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, I might need to restore my bookmarks backup from IE5.

What up, Lycos?

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about Jeeves? Did anyone ask Jeeves?

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll Infoseek an answer on that.

[–] DrNeurohax@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

You dare question the majesty of AltaVista?

[–] DrNeurohax@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you're right. I think before that was metasearch.com. It was basically a top frame that you entered the search in with a row of icons, and the bottom frame would render the search results from whichever sites you chose. I'm pretty sure it removed all the extra elements, too, so it was actually pretty decent.

[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, I miss Dogpile! It was my go-to search engine in grad school (along with Altavista and Ask)

[–] Web_Rand@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Dogpile is still around, and it's still a meta search engine.

[–] inverimus@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DDG is mostly sourced from Bing already. It isn't hard to test this, just do a search on both sites in private mode and you get the same top results.

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Still way better than Google in terms of sponsored results and ads.

[–] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FWIW DuckDuckGo sources the traditional links / results from Bing. Their Instant Answers info does come directly from other sources, e.g. Wikipedia.

Source: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good to know, thanks. I'd heard that DDG sources its results from other engines, though I thought they were ramping up their own index. Honestly, I haven't paid close enough attention to it all. Nor have I tried Bing given that DDG has generally been good enough for me to not bother looking elsewhere.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Google is just a ranked ad delivery service based on an abused and gamed SEO system, it's fucking awful for delivering useful links.

You're fooling yourself if you think Bing is any different, or that ChatGPT won't become the same thing. It's destiny is to be a smarter version of Alexa, only users will falsely assume neutrality it doesn't possess.

The only thing the others have over Google is they're not the primary focus of SEO, but that will change. SEO has devoured the corpse of Google search and waiting to determine what prey it should focus on next.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

One thing with an AI-based search engines is that they might have better luck not getting influenced by SEO techniques. Like I can pretty reliably look at a website and determine if it's useful or just got to the top by gaming the search engine. It just takes time, and I'm sure some tools could help even more with that

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% Google has been the best place to put effort it. If they slide down the popularity ladder then the next will become the zone of battle. I'm firmly of the belief that all options are temporary and on an eventual course of becoming bad, some faster than others. It's a case of being able to just adapt and move on. Be it google, reddit, netflix, whatever.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time for a federated search engine?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stop. Don't make federated the next crypto/blockchain

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It was mostly in jest. But some sort of community run search engine could be interesting.

[–] Skyline@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 year ago

I’ve heard that Bing is a good alternate

Google is just a ranked ad delivery service based on an abused and gamed SEO system, it’s fucking awful for delivering useful links.

For what it's worth, Bing is similarly full of ads, but with a more cluttered page design and a lot of video previews. Often times I find its suggestions for related searches get in the way of actually reading the search results for the current search...

[–] UrielMC@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Startpage or searxng are better

[–] stardustsystem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Good for privacy, but there's definitely features (and processing power) that don't exist there.

I've been using Startpage for a few weeks now and honestly it doesn't bug me waiting an extra 3-5 seconds for my results page when it's not ad-fueled garbage.

[–] rosenjcb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Going to do a run with duckduckgo in my browser. Probably about time I move stuff away from Google anyways.

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Something to keep in mind, if you can't find what you're looking for, and want to give Google a try after DDG: you add "!g" to the search and DDG wil redirect you to a Google results page.

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave Search is basically DuckDuckGo but with an independent index. unfortunately it doesn't support images yet so it redirects you when you click on "images"

[–] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love brave search. I think it's way better than DDG. and that's not even considering their summarizer feature. it's basically autotldr for your search

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same, I love it too. The UI is great, it's fast, and the discussions tab is nice. I get pretty high quality results too.

[–] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I can't believe I forgot the discussions tab! that is a super awesome feature. especially now since it works on all sorts of forum sites, not just reddit, since that's gone to shit

[–] mokpo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Never heard of that before. This is awesome.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kagi has been shockingly good, honestly.

[–] gk99@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've heard that Bing is a good alternate, even though its a Microsoft service.

It's gotten a lot better recently, though sometimes I do still have to switch to Google to find stuff. I don't care that much about my search engine privacy, so I mainly use this because Microsoft Rewards nets me giftcards and such just from searching.

But privacy-conscious people should stay the hell away.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ive had some success using phind but I'm pretty sure this is just another way of using chat GPT without an account.

Either way, before the migration I found Google useless for anything but searching for stuff on Reddit, or answering questions about video games.

Good luck going to Google these days without already knowing the answer to your question.