this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
98 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38987 readers
2010 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly half of the air-to-ground munitions that Israel has used in Gaza in its war with Hamas since October 7 have been unguided, otherwise known as “dumb bombs,” according to a new US intelligence assessment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

How exactly do you know the never once named person, who is only and ever refered to as "US Official" and who made that comment, is "experienced"?!

Plenty of people in that article who put their name on the line along with their words say the exact opposite of the anonymous "US Official".

Clearly you just liked that statement (no doubt because it aligns with your political beliefs) and went backwards from there to assuming the anonymous person quoted making that statement is "experienced", which is fine amongst people who already believe the same politics as you but won't convince anybody with 2 brain cells.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah, I just don't believe you who provides no proof for your claim.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If that was a thinking posture you would have the same proof requirement for quotes from "US Officials" who want to remainn unnamed as you do for the person whose only claim is that you can't outright trust without further proof what's said by unnamed "US Officials".

It's quite funny that your counter to my point is to demand that I prove my claim that you should demand proof from anonymous sources.