this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Gadgets

1 readers
1 users here now

Gadget (noun): a small mechanical / electrical device or tool, especially an ingenious or novel one.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] McLeavey@alien.top 0 points 9 months ago (8 children)

"... the camera was originally planned to sell for about US$1,000 (with a lower-priced $400 to $700 version to follow), it will now set you back $5,495..."

You could also buy a fully functional Beaulieu cine16 camera with lenses for less than $2k and still have $3k to spend on the purchase and development of the film.

This is only going to sell to influencers or people who have more money to waste than film making talent. Kodak, whom invented the video camera then shelved it, is a great example of how to run a multi billion dollar company into the ground with pure hubris.

[–] driftingfornow@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Ah wtf 5k for a super 8?

[–] Javasndphotoclicks@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

You’re thinking of the digital camera that was developed in 1975 they shelved because they were seeing a roll of film that cost them 5 cents to make for $2.

[–] WaitingForNormal@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I wonder how loud this thing is though. Is that used beaulieu motor still gonna be sync? Also looks like this thing has a video tap, that’s nice. What people really need to consider are the prices not shown here. The film, the processing, the video transfer…

[–] Wooow675@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

After taxes that’s a $6k Super 8 camera.

I’m just reading my sentence out loud and I can’t believe this is a real thing.

[–] TheOneWhoReadsStuff@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

There are case studies on Kodak’s propensity for making bad decisions.

[–] RobertdBanks@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Holllly fuck, I remember $1k seeming steep, $5k ensures literally no one will buy this. Wow, how disappointing. I’ve literally been looking forward to this thing since like 2016.

[–] PatSajaksDick@alien.top 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This isn’t the same Kodak is it? It’s a zombie brand

[–] Lujho@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

As in, the brand name’s been bought and sold a few times and there’s really no relation to the original company? You do see that a lot with old hi-fi brands and such, but I think Kodak is still THE Kodak.

[–] Dull-Lead-7782@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

They were able to restructure in bankruptcy, sell off some assets and bounce back. A big money maker for them is an archival film stock for long term storage of theatrical releases

[–] JacobVossFilm@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Kodak is not a zombie company. Still produce motion picture film that we use every day (also pharmaceuticals now lol)

[–] PatSajaksDick@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah pretty sure I was thinking of Polaroid

[–] Mallingong@alien.top 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

All that and it charges via Micro USB, there are cameras designed for children that have more advanced features than this garbage.

[–] LathropWolf@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Hah... the worst of the USB connections even. $5500 camera with a cable only worth a penny that has it's charging pins go flat and more in it's poor design?

[–] Riversntallbuildings@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

They won’t be able to sell it in the EU. LOL

USB-C or wireless. All the other cables need to die.

[–] joevsyou@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago