this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
637 points (95.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35472 readers
342 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 239 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm pretty sure it's saying you can't turn left onto the road to the left of the intersection. Looks like some pretty bad road design.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 146 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't realize we were here to play geoguessr but you win!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 87 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm gonna say it's easy when the street names are in the photo.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Easier, definitely. And a unique street name. But it's quite hard to read the cross street name. All I can see is the "E DR" at the end. I probably wouldn't have bothered from just seeing the one street and no other text.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I got lucky with Google Maps highlighting the apartment building in the background as a POI to match up with.

[–] odium@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

It's also easier when there are no rules saying you can't enter that road name into Google maps.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Atlanta and Peachtree Rd/Ln/Dr/Ave/Way/Plaza/literally 65 more variations of this say hello.

[–] Sausage_Mahoney@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think it makes giving directions easier. Everything in this town is 'just off Peachtree'

[–] batucada@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

¡Dale asereeeee!

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand the intent from your graphic, but given the signage, I would not have known what they expected of me.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The painting on the road should indicate a 45° left instead of 90° left.

[–] naticus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Relative to forward travel it's 45°.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, although since you're specifically referring to the angle indicated by the painting on the road, referring to the angle of the painted arrow itself would be clearer.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

? I'm saying the painting on the road should be painted as 45° instead of its current 90°.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they're saying the arrow would be drawn at a 135° angle compared to the "vertical" base.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're driving and someone says to do a 180° turn, do you continue driving straight or do you turn around? Angle is measured by direction of travel. Works for 90° too which is probably the confusion.

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're absolutely correct. I just thought it made for a funny photo. It's very on brand for this city to do dumb shit like this.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been confused and made dangerous choices in traffic for less stupid reasons. Not trying to deflect all blame but considering the lowest common denominator, road construction and signs really need to pay much more attention to the limits of the human brain.

Half of us have an IQ below 100 and we could be driving in darkness, with rain pouring down and facing traffic that shines its headlights into our eyes. The road needs to have an affordance that suggests to the driver how to drive correctly, instead of causing confusion when you already have a lot of traffic to keep track of.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bad road design for sure, but the sign still could be better. For example they could make a custom sign, draw the intersection and mark explicitly that you can't turn to Oakwood.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just have the sign arrow be more than 90°

[–] hazeebabee@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

This is exactly the type of content i was hoping for when i clicked on the comments. Thank you for all you hard work sluthing for an explination of a random photo. Its truly gods work that your doing.