this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1191 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

5234 readers
2501 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Isn't it strange how the US has had formidable firearms freedoms for >200 years but mass shootings only became commonplace some ~30 years ago?

Doesn't Canada have better access to mental healthcare?

[–] strangehill2dieon@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hmmm I wonder why there weren't any mass shootings TWO HUNDRED YEARS AGO. What a ridiculous argument

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Crazy thing is it's been 200 years since 200 years ago 🤯

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kinda hard to have a mass shooting with a flintlock.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mmkay well they call it a 1911 because that was the year it was invented. What else ya got?

[–] Bruno_Myers@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

clearly it was all the good guys with guns stopping them.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bruno_Myers@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe there just weren't any? Maybe mass shootings are a symptom of how fucked up our society has become?

[–] Bruno_Myers@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

yes, the society where beating your wife was a fact of life was certainly a normal one. all the lead in the air was good for your brain too! you know crime has gone down and only continues to drop, right? sorry, but the facts don't give a shit about your fear-mongering

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This was made in 1881 a few months after the assassination of James Garfield

Mass shootings weren't commonplace, but the talking points sure were

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I'm not sure what your point is

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

America's debate on guns has gone on well before mass shootings, and that the exact same points are brought up. Back then the big scary weapon was the revolver.

My point is none of this is truly new.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago

Yes I agree, it's a tired argument

[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Fully automatic weapons didn't exist back then.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How many fully automatic weapons do you think are used in mass shootings?

The answer is zero. This is the problem. You people want to regulate things you don't understand.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sad scenario but I would not consider this a mass shooting. This was fallout from a robbery attempt.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

And this shooting displayed that the common police equipment of the time (pistols, shotguns) were ineffective against determined and well equipped criminals. Police wanted handy, precise rifles (AR-15), and better armour for themselves and vehicles in case of emergency.

So the police looked to relatively cheap mil surplus and things that were compatible with them, fast forward a few decades and that is why the police have a ton of military grade gear.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't know who needs to hear this but fully automatic weapons (1 trigger press=many bullets until the trigger is released) are not used in mass shootings.

Semi automatic weapons (1 trigger press=1 bullet) are and a majority of guns used in crime and defense belong in this category. I know some people get annoyed because it's seen as nitpicking but even if you are anti gun you need to understand guns enough to make a coherent argument. I recommend having someone you trust take you to a range if you can.

But yeah imagine a group of government officials wanted to regulate cell phones but constantly said tablets like the words are interchangable. Then they start using vague terms like "smart screens" all the time like it means one very particular thing. You see what I mean.

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good luck carrying a Maxim Gun into a school to massacre children.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah way too heavy. Wheel it around on a tripod or mount it to a wagon instead

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Patented in 83. Thanks, Maxim! (The dude, not the magazine)