this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
353 points (88.1% liked)

Memes

45190 readers
1714 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anarchist government, preferably communist in nature but mutualist works too.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities?

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 11 months ago

Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don’t think there was any authority in those cultures?

[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies?

Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance"

You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right?

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Generally anarchism does reject the idea of authority wholesale whilst also having no historical basis for it. Those societies were clearly in a very different place. I suggest you look into dialects as they will provide comprehensive explanations as to authority and its foundations (and why there are different conditions then than now) especially seeing as they fully had “coercive” authority. Now as to what non-coercive authority is, I don’t think even the anarchists have cracked that one