this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
484 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39011 readers
3096 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having bright colors makes it more appealing to everyone but is an especially effective marketing tactic for children. Of course it doesn't only appeal to children, but it's a provably effective way to get children's attention.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Everyone is drawn to bright colors, not just children.

I still haven't been shown any ads at all, much less any aimed at children.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not about to watch some ads to win an argument on the internet. Here's this though, which I added into an edit above but you may have not seen that.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bbV6I8VRMG8

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=bbV6I8VRMG8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This video is unbearable to watch. It's even worse than the DARE crap in the 80's. If this is your proof that there are ads directed at kids I'm sorry but it ain't it.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you even watch it? I don't remember, but I don't think it's anti-vape or anything. It just discusses how they've forgotten why anti-smoking ads worked. It's largely a media analysis channel.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't remember? You're the one linking to it lol

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched it when it was uploaded. I haven't rewarched it.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You should watch it again. It is anti vape lol. You don't even know what you're linking .

Which is fine, I'm not a fan of vapes, but that video is on the same level as dare if you can even get through the annoying narrator.

Still waiting for a child targeted ad example.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Rewatching it, it literally uses DARE as an example that doesn't work. It also talks about smoking weed in a non-negative stance.

It's literally just about effective messaging, politics, and history, not about the product. I'd recommend getting past five seconds. There's some negative statements about smoking, but the only negative statements about vaping is that nicotine addiction is on the rise now.