this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
682 points (98.4% liked)

Greentext

4437 readers
1195 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

WFH solves at least three of those problems, but only if our corporate lords allow it.

[–] Klystron@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wfh only benefits a pretty small subset of the population... Speaking as someone who can't work from home.

[–] Pinecone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It still benefits you by greatly reducing traffic.

[–] Klystron@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I work a graveyard shift so traffic doesn't really affect me. Which I'm sure is at least somewhat common among the people who can't wfh.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I work in an underground lair in a barracks. It wouldn't benefit me either, so not much interest in supporting it. I'd rather we vote for faster escalators. Now that's something everyone can use.