this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
454 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45585 readers
1570 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aninjanameddaryll@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Eh, if it were easier to block an instance as a user, I'd be 100% with you instead of 95%.

There are instances that are batshit crazy. Since blocking an instance as a user just ain't possible yet, I can see why defederation before trouble gets going is useful. Once the nasty side of the internet gets snowballing, it's much harder to manage.

Troll, or serious extremist, some things are just cancerous.

[–] Elgordofordo86@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are good points but apparently it was just a community on that instance... The instance itself wasn't the problem. You can in fact block a community as a user. People absolutely have the power to block the_Donald community on that instance on their own.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, admins need the power to block communities for all users on their instance. You don't want to have a list for new users of "communities you might want to block". They should be blocked for you, and the list of blocks should be publicly available.

[–] Die4Ever@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

or hide communities from All by default, like how reddit hides certain subs from r/all

[–] Wander@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Elgordofordo86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Blocking entire instances is. Not individual communities.

[–] Elgordofordo86@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can't people decide for themselves? I don't get the appeal of someone blocking something for me? A real turn off for me on lemmy so far. I get it for now since the tools aren't there yet but long term if it continues to be an issue I'd probably have to self host or get out.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can decide for themselves. They can run their own server or join a server that has few rules (although that server may get defederated by others).

That's way more freedom than you get on non-federated social media.

[–] Elgordofordo86@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's freedom in the loosest sense. As in there's more options. Would it still be freedom if a government makes choices for you? I suppose if I have the means to move to a different country it technically still is. Still distasteful. I don't know the people that run my instance. Why should I trust them to know what's best? We'll see how it shakes out.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Because some problems require a hammer and others require orbital nukes...

[–] tymon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

This is a good point

[–] Taxxor@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since blocking an instance as a user just ain’t possible yet

I don't think that would solve the legal issue so it doesn't really matter in many cases. Even if you personally blocked an instance, your home instance will still recieve copies of that instance as long as someone else is interacting with it. And with that comes the fear of unintentionally hosting something illegal on your instance becasue you have the copies from that other instance.

So again there would be no other solution than defederating.