this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
609 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39367 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 16-year-old boy has been arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage in connection with the felling of the 300-year-old Sycamore Gap tree in the north of England.

Officers arrested the teenager amid an outpouring of sadness over the destruction of the landmark, which has been a feature of the site at Hadrian’s Wall in Northumberland for hundreds of years. The boy is in custody and assisting officers with their inquiries, Northumbria police said on Thursday.

Locals and national park authorities said they were “struggling to see the logic” in the destruction of a sycamore which had long become “part of this area’s DNA” and had gone through thousands of changes of seasons.

The tree, believed to have been about 300 years old, was made famous when it appeared in the 1991 film Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, starring Kevin Costner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can still dislike someone for doing something heinous, even though the crime isn't comparable.

Wanton destruction of a living being of historical and cultural significance isn't any more or less acceptable than violating someone's agency and personhood, marring them for life.

[–] threadloose@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, so, lots of rape survivors have asked people to stop framing rape as something that mars a person for life, because it's basically a rephrasing of the outdated idea of a "ruined woman". You can't ruin a person. A lot of people really struggle with the idea that they're dirty forever, and hearing that said by allies constantly doesn't help their recovery. You can still recognize the harm that rape does without reinforcing outdated concepts of purity, where before they were pure and unmarked and after they're "marred for life" with no recovery.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re speaking to one. I thank you not to put words in my mouth.

[–] threadloose@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Wow, I've been sexually assaulted too. Guess we're at a detente.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

More. The answer is that killing a tree is more acceptable than rape. What’s wrong with you?

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, if we are going to compare.. which would be worse: raping a tree or killing a 300 y/o old woman?

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Funniest thing I've read today. Well done.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The splinters would be punishment enough. And that lady’s probably a vampire.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They quite literally did.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There must be a miscommunication somewhere. It looked like you were saying one wasn’t more acceptable than the other, but I’ll take you at your word that you didn’t mean that. Because that would be an insane thing to say, yet I’m getting downvoted for pointing it out.