this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
20 points (57.9% liked)

Memes

45649 readers
1621 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we stop posting political memes?... It's getting annoying.

[–] theEmeraldM@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah. Although I like socialism and partially agree with the meme, I'm really tired of constantly seeing political memes, so at this point I just down vote any political meme that I see lol

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The worst thing for the socialist movement are other socialists

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh I think the worst thing for the socialist movement is the history of what happens when socialism runs into economic and political reality. But a good number two is internal discord between socialists, yeah

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You spelled the central intelligence agency and western intelligence apparatus wrong

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, everything is the evil CIA's fault. Never mind that the communists had their own intelligence agencies! They didn't have any agency and all their actions were puppeted by the evil capitalists because of how amazingly competent capitalists apparently are. But yeah no let's do communism because even in a brutal dictatorship some liberals can beat the shit out of us in technology, economic prosperity, soft power, hard power, and diplomacy.

Go touch some grass, tankie scum

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure.

So anyway Henry Kissinger is a name you should look up. Allen Dulles. George HW Bush. Roy Cohn. Good places to start.

Also the term Whataboutism fits here. I'm saying socialism isn't allowed to exist because of the Western Capitalism supplied Intelligence Agencies. What are you talking about?

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gorbachev, Stalin, Brezhnev, Lenin, etc, etc. Communists tried to make sure capitalism couldn't exist far harder than capitalists did for communism. And it was communists who declared that particular war. Lenin, in fact, is the architect of institutions like the comintern which took that as their goal.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communists tried to make sure capitalism couldn't exist far harder than capitalists did for communism

That's just literally not true. Financially alone communist countries didn't have the money to fight back, that's why they often moved towards socialism. Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela. The countries were poor because heavy capitalist countries owned the main exports of these countries. Like the term Banana Republic is one sided.

The entire goal of socialism is for workers to change the structure of capitalism. "Declaring war" in that way is like the war on drugs, language more than anything. This is not like a Jihad. It is just the philosophical belief that we aren't truly free until we own our venue of money making. As a people that's for the country you live in, as a person or worker it is for the company you operate with.

This war is a declaration of change of the relationship of the rich and poor, the workers and the owners.

But if you really think the KGB has done as much as the CIA I have a bridge to sell you. The KGB wish they were the CIA.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. They didn't have the money to properly fight back. Because communism sucks. With a continent span ing empire and imperial authority over the entire Warsaw Pact and Comintern, the USSR was still a decrepit, corrupt shithole of a nation propped up by the shambling corpse of Marxist-Leninist economic theory. Communism fails, and fails again, and again, and again, not because capitalists have unfairly stopped them, but because it is an economic system as badly suited to the modern world as mercantilism or feudalism.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Took a lot of words for you to express you really don't know what you're talking about.

Marxist-Leninist economic theory? Lmfao.

I also find it hilarious you both agree the countries couldn't fight back but also you're saying capitalists never fought them in the first place. They did very aggressively.

If you want to continue being ignorant about the CIA go ahead but you're just wrong bud. Like the Red Scare was real, the Cold War happened. Kissinger was constantly looking for excuses to nuke anyone over socialism.

You are cluelessly outside your mind

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said the communists couldn't prosecute the war against capitalism that they started because their economic theory is shit and doesn't work well in the real world. Which is true.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and I'm saying you sound so clueless treating this like some weird war between factions. It is an extremely uninformed position and view.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's.... historical truth, dude. The interim goal of the USSR was to overthrow capitalism in Germany, and then from there, enact world communist revolution under their aegis via COMECON

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the CIA, who has way more funding, didn't constantly overthrow any form of socialism they smelled? Okay.

Do you support unions or workers rights by chance?

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, sure, they did.

Do you support unions or workers rights by chance?

Absolutely. Which is one big reason why I oppose communism. One of the first things the bolshevists did when they seized power is took the right to appoint officials to labor unions and worker's Soviets, and turned those representative organizations into agents of the Party rather than representatives of the workers.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is fine. But you can't deny the entire history of worker's rights is haunted by capitalists trying to prevent or entirely suppress it. Socialism has followed the same path. Any time it is implemented from basic worker rights, which is a left socialist goal, it is intentionally poisoned by those in power.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Of course it is. That's why the role of governments in a capitalist society includes protecting workers rights, including union rights. That's best done via democratic representation in a liberal democracy. But the presence of workers rights or union rights doesn't end capitalism.

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

When will these hate crimes against strawmen end!!

Socialism isn't a single system bud, neither is capitalism. Are you suggesting the current state of any society on this planet is utopian? Probably not.

More capitalist countries and empires have fallen than socialist ones. More death happens because of the structure of capitalism. Capitalism has caused more wars. It has existed longer, there's literally no arguing any of what I just stated.

Are any of these arguments good to stop someone from exploring what capitalism can do or offer? No. So stop being stupid.

Historically also, no. No socialist country was allowed to exist without foreign interference.

Stop boiling everything down to a meme you halfwit. We absolutely need more socialist policymaking and a genuine consideration of what society needs to look like.

[–] Levsgetso@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not we, this guy is the only person posting these political memes here. I hate blocking users but posting multiple memes a day trying to push your agenda is pretty annoying.

[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, I just noticed his instance. You're probably correct!, great tip.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t find a single meme that isn’t political. Whether you like it or not there is political messaging in every single piece of media

[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well I didn't mean it like that. I obviously meant memes that the sole purpose is to bait the opposing party into raging in the comments.

The occasional meme and critique should be fine though.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the only reason some appear less political to you is that you aren’t the oppressed in those memes

[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah. I just don't care. I don't go for memes for the political content.

If I want to discuss politics I'll do it elsewhere.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The very claim that you don’t care only shows that you are privileged and hence can ignore the political aspects

[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I didn't get my point across clearly, that's on me. English is not my first language.

What I meant is, I don't care about politics on the MEMES community. It's not against the rules, but my opinion is that politics should stay out of "hehe that's funny" content.

Political content on here only serves to further divide and annoy people. Politics should be discussed just not on here (again, imo)

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But memes are political regardless

[–] Waker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The political memes are, naturally, political. There's plenty of non political memes.

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, not really