this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
733 points (96.1% liked)

Dank Memes

6192 readers
187 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
BurningTurtle@lemmy.burningturtle.win
BurningTurtle@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
733
I'm starting to wonder if they've thought this out. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/dankmemes@lemmy.world
150 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fyurion@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though even then, the sun would never go below the horizon, it would fly off in a stright line and disappear. Going below the horizon only works on a globe

[–] xintrik@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The idea is that the light is small and close. It doesn't need to go over the horizon to disappear in the distance.

I'm not sure how they explain the random pattern the light would need to travel for different seasons or why it looks so massive as it rises or sets.

[–] green_pyroxene@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"it doesn't need to go over the horizon to disappear in the distance", but the problem is that it does go over the horizon rather than disappearing, as anyone who's seen a sunset can attest

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Following their own logic, you should be able to see the sun with enough magnification.

[–] xintrik@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's your problem right there: you're using logic.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The magic word is refraction. It explains everything.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so most visible stars are about 1000 light years away. And they're still visible. And our sun obviously cannot travel at least over 1000 light years twice a day.

[–] xintrik@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

For reference a light year is about 63241 times further than the distance between the earth and sun.