this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
788 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2464 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your question is basically "why are embargoes effective"

Collectively shunning an economy cripples it, and it's most effective when widely adopted.

Pepsi should be ashamed of their actions.

[–] napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My question was more specific than that. I absolutely understand why it is important to sanction high-tech products and stop Russia from exporting their goods.

But western companies selling non-critical goods inside Russia felt more like russian economic dependancy to western companies to me, which (for me as a layman when it comes to economy) seemed preferable to Russia having an independent economy. Thats where my question came from.

Now I realized that rather than "dependant economy" or "independant economy" the intended goal in this case is "no economy", although i am doubtful whether that will really work.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Because Russia companies can't make Pepsi products, they just don't have the supply chain to get the flavor right. They can, and do make similar products already, it's just Mountain Dew is way better than off brand Mountain Dew. If the Russian consumers wanted that, they would have been buying it already.

I for one would never drink a cola that is not coca cola. Soda is a luxury, and in my opinion no other cola has the flavor profile to be worth the calories. Some people feel the same way about Pepsi, and a massive amount of people feel that way about Mountain Dew and other Pepsi products.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How's that been working for Russia? Hasn't their manufacturing PMI been shooting up? Isn't inflation actually higher than desired because their economy is red hot?

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Lol.

No.

The rubble has fallen to the value of approximately one penny.

That's the cause of their inflation: because their currency is worthless.