this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
275 points (94.5% liked)

News

23284 readers
4230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Japan started releasing treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, a polarising move that prompted China to announce an immediate blanket ban on all aquatic products from Japan.

China is "highly concerned about the risk of radioactive contamination brought by... Japan's food and agricultural products," the customs bureau said in a statement.

The Japanese government signed off on the plan two years ago and it was given a green light by the U.N. nuclear watchdog last month. The discharge is a key step in decommissioning the Fukushima Daiichi plant after it was destroyed by a tsunami in 2011.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

US psyops trying to gaslight the content of the article. There are trace elements of other contaminants... Of unknown concentration, and we have to take TEPCO's word that it's "like, totally safe man, just like our nuclear reactors"

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's 4.5 billion tons of uranium dissolved in the ocean, I'm pretty sure a couple milligrams of trace elements isn't going to change anything.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, because that's a great answer to a localized ban.

Guess what? Most of the volume of the ocean isn't chilling in Japanese territorial waters.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. currents exist

  2. even without currents mixing the water, diluting trace elements into the fucking ocean is fine

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not at concentrations noticeably higher than normal ocean water.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're claiming they're higher, show your data. Your article says trace. Barring figures showing different, trace means nearly undetectable.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see the concentration. Show me a citation with the ppb figure and specific isotopes.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, give me a source which lists the actual concentrations of contaminants

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's literally in the article

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

If you're too lazy to click the source, that's a you problem mate.