this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
1198 points (99.1% liked)

Android

27985 readers
202 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheels@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Phones only have glass backs to let wireless charging work so I don’t see aluminium making a come back any time soon.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wireless charging isn't all that needed IMO. It's kind of old technology, my phone had it 10 years ago but none of my phones have had it since and I haven't really missed it because USB C charging is fast enough where wireless charging isn't really necessary.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's also a gimmick afaic, it's not "Wireless" to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It's a glorified magsafe lmao

[–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice.

When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'd never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I'm never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it.

[–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

[–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it's nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time.

[–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo.

But to each their own.

[–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Each to their own indeed!

[–] electriccars@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it's magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there.

[–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread?

We've had wireless charging in every single material back and it's absolutely wonderful QOL improvement.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth.

[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

WTF? Just don't use wireless charging ffs. What a dumb opinion.

[–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit

[–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

And the extra costs to support a feature I never use.

[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile?

[–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The glass backs that this conversation started with

[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation.

[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass.

[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy.

[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :)

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging.

So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile

[–] feduser934@vlemmy.net 5 points 1 year ago

Plastic also works, and is far more durable

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Phone manufacturers: "Man this glass stuff likes to shatter a lot no matter what we try to make it stronger. I know, let's wrap the whole phone in it that'll solve everything!!!! 111"

[–] Omega@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

We had phones with glass backs before wireless charging was widespread (see sony xperia z phones from 8+ years ago for example)