this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1457 points (95.7% liked)

> Greentext

7548 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

His show is entertainment first and foremost. That means glorifying stupid bullshit for the entertainment value of it.

Most hard science is boring. Most fringe theory thinking is dramatic and thrilling.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard science can be the most wonderful things you ever heard about. You merely need someone to explains it right.

Optimizing for truth sometimes creates something entertaining, but only by coincidence. I suppose you can say that the truth is entertaining specifically because it is the truth, but crazy stuff claims to be the truth too. Only someone who already knows the difference is going to appreciate the former more than the latter.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would rather someone excitedly tell me about how gravitational lensing is usedto view a black hole over listening to some fuckwit go on about how there is an Ice wall around the flat earth patrolled by Navies to prevent the truth that Nasa faked Australia coming out.

[–] Mountaineer@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nasa faked Australia

As an Australian, this is wild and I want to know more.

Edit: Woah. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/australia-doesnt-exit-people-who-live-actors-paid-nasa-kurt-nielsen

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Speak for yourself. Hard science isn't boring to me.

[–] Hardeehar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I guess this is why he is successful. Entertaining.