Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
Went to a restaurant in LA today and when I got the check I noticed that it was a bit higher than it should be. Then I noticed this 18% service charge. So... We, as customers, need to help pay for their servers instead of the owners paying their servers a living wage. And on top of that they have suggested tip. I called bs on this. I will bet you that the servers do not see a dime of this 18% service charge. [deleted a word so it wasn't a grammatical horror to read]
This line of thinking is just making serving a less attractive job for millions of people to save yourself a small amount of money.
This line of thinking is what let's wage thieves sleep at night.
Tell me you don't understand wage theft without telling me you don't understand wage theft.
If they have started charging this service fee customers will be less inclined to tip on top. So if the money from the service fee is not entirely being used to increase staff wages, then the restaurant management is effectively stealing their tips. That is wage theft in spirit if not legal definition.
This conclusions requires two separate assumptions from you that are not evidence-based
The sun's core being filled with a quark plasma soup instead of, for example cotton candy, is also an assumption that is not evidence-based.
It's almost like we as humans can use logic and reason to determine things to be extremely significantly probable without having proof in our hands.
The sun's composition is absolutely evidence-based.
https://www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/www_solar/PUS/PO/howstudy.html#:~:text=The%20interior%20of%20the%20Sun,this%20part%20of%20the%20Sun.
You're making the assumption that 1: this money is embezzled by the owner
2: people are less likely to tip
You're also making a third: that servers receiving less pay won't go elsewhere
Whereas we extrapolate from data to understand the Sun (moving from evidence to conclusion) you are starting with your expected result and then manufacturing caused (embezzlement, lack of tips)
This is the opposite of using "logic and reason"
I believe you made the argument stating that this is going to reduce server's wages and if these fees aren't going to employees and its not the business owner keeping them, then where could that money possibly be going?
No I said people wanting to move servers to a set hourly wage would reduce their wages.
But where's the logic and reason in this opinion? The other guy is "making assumptions" by saying this will improve conditions when they don't have to beg for tips, and here you're saying their wages will go down without any facts or evidence immediately after your snarky analogy about the sun's position. Ridiculous.
That's not the point I was making though. If the servers are tipped less due to this policy (the other person's claim) and make less money, they're likely to quit because serving has extremely high turnover anyway
However -
Servers regularly are tipped above "target percentages." This is a fact - especially once you consider places with low cost-per-plate (diners etc). If you pay them 15% of total sales or whatever you're essentially capping tips at 15%, lowering their wages.