this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
2658 points (97.8% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
571 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, just wrappers. Steam wasn't untill fairly recently, but they were slowly switching to it for some time.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So that's why it runs worse now.

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

It all makes sense

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a good idea if Google be pulling some shit

[–] deus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, it's weird for them to rely on Google considering how hard Valve has worked to make Steam independent from MS.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

It probably doesn't matter for what they do. There isn't really much need for an ad blocker on a browser that's going to a store page which is essentially an ad for a product in and of itself. A steam user actually wants that store page to load, why would there be a need for a store page?

And they could transition to something else if Google does something that affects them.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Chromium isn't technically Google

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Still serves googles goal of control over the internet.

[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago

It's maintained by Google, which is pretty much the same thing - in the end, they get to decide what features get implemented and what doesn't make the cut. Sure we can fork it, and we can make our own, but in the end as long as their code is the main base, they have a lot of control over all the different forks, as usually the forks will have to keep rebasing their code off of new updates to stay as secure and up to date as possible.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is, good luck hard forking such a huge codebase.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's too weird. So many apps today are just Chromium wrappers. It's just easier to use a premade base, plus you don't have to develop the web and desktop version independently, they can literally be the same code.

While that's fairly typical and good practice in dev circles, we're talking about a company that's single handedly elevated an entire OS to prevent a big company taking too much power. I think the key here is they don't really compete with Google.