this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
1148 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26771 readers
3051 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imaginary numbers are merely a poorly named mathematical construct used to reconcile the empirically observable phenomena of nature (e.g., summations of waves). They’re the means by which we achieve mathematical closure under exponentiation. You could call them whatever the F you want, so long as they could be used to represent vectors in the complex plane.

What reason do you have to believe in anything outside of material nature?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] apolo399@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago
[–] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Up to the introduction of quantum mechanics imaginary numbers where only ever a theoretical tool and any calculation in electromagnetism, mechanics or even relativity can be done without them.

Also, any measurement you can make will always result in real numbers because there is no logical interpretation for imaginary measurements (a speed of 2+i m/s doesnt really make sense)

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bro, are you not aware of the Fourier transform?!? Electrical impedance? Wtf???

[–] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said that any calculation in electrodynamics CAN be done without imaginary numbers, I never said that it would be the most common or convenient way of doing things.

If you use a different form of solution to maxwells equations, electrical impedance can totally be expressed as just another real property. Fourier transform also is not necessary to solve maxwells equations or any other physical systems. It just might make it significantly easier and more convenient.

Obviously imaginary numbers existed and where used way before quantum mechanics was a thing but they werent technically necessary in physics because they never appeared in the equations of fundamental theories (Maxwells equations, general relativity, newtonian mechanics)

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and one CAN integrate by taking paper cuttings and dispense entirely with the idea of infinity.

[–] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just trying to make an argument that imaginary numbers were technically not necessary and thus it makes historical sense that they werent seen as something 'real'. Im not trying to get people to stop using them ;)

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Eh, this is not worth your time or mine to argue about. Let’s move on. Also, I take your point.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imaginary numbers are indeed poorly named. They are not much more imaginary than members of ℝ.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's all fine... except for the part where reality has a √-1 component.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, in AC circuits, having √3̅+√-̅1̅ A of current makes as much sense as having 2 amps with a 30° phase shift. It's just easier notation for calculations - Cartesian coordinates for what would otherwise be polar.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's BS notation. If you want Cartesian, just use 3i+1j, no need for some impossible √-1 that you then redefine some operations for, just so it becomes orthogonal to R.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The nice thing about 𝑖 = √-̅1̅ is that you don’t need to redefine any operations for it, ℐ𝓂 is “automatically” orthogonal to ℛℯ.

[–] dyen49k@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You might want to look up geometric algebra for a better geometric interpretation of complex numbers than the complex plane with a "real" and "imaginary" axis

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but quantum mechanics is just magic.