this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
-30 points (20.0% liked)

Conservative

435 readers
133 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen so much confusion between the two, at first I thought it was trolls, but it's so consistent that I've begun to wonder if they actually don't understand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Since you didn't disagree, it sounds like we both agree that the FOSS movement is compatible with communist ideals.

Only the theory impacts the founding of the FOSS movement so communism in practice is irrelevant.

I've been talking about the FOSS movement this entire time, which dates to 1983. IBM only started interacting with the modern FOSS movement in a significant way in the 90s per https://www.ibm.com/opensource/story/

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Foss is neither communist nor capitalist. It’s just a way to distribute software. If anything it’s capitalist since to survive they sell support and other things. It’s just one model of many. If you look it’s mainly for profit companies investing in it. Look at the top contributors for many projects and they are for profit companies donating to the project.

[–] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why are the donors relevant? This is like arguing that Yugoslavia wasn't communist because they received foreign aid from the US.

"They sell support and other things" Most (all?) theories of communism don't have currency when they reach the communist stage but if you're trying to make a socialist structure work in capitalism it would look like free open source projects.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

There is nothing socialist about foss. I have worked on foss projects for twenty years. I get paid. We charge for our product. What is socialist about that?

The workers don’t control anything. The large companies contributing are in control.