this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
73 points (98.7% liked)

World News

40268 readers
3343 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Without the funding, Thames Water will run out of money in March, which could force the government to temporarily nationalize the company. Both the government and Thames Water say water will continue flowing to customers regardless of what happens.

Thames Water, which has about 17 billion pounds ($20.9 billion) of debt and has been repeatedly cited for illegal sewage spills, is at the center of a nationwide backlash over rising water bills as Britain seeks to modernize its water and sewage systems to cope with climate change and a growing population.

The company has been the focus of criticism from consumers and politicians who say Thames Water created its own problems by paying overly generous dividends to investors and high salaries to executives while failing to invest in pipelines, pumps and reservoirs. Company executives say the fault lies with regulators who kept bills too low for too long, starving the company of the cash it needed to fund improvements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are far more interested in assigning blame than fixing the issue.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sigh, there it is. It was a matter of time really, typical right wing gibberish and insults.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not even vaguely right wing, read some of my other posts. I only added that last part as it made me laugh but I removed it, I did like your 'now you see the violence inherent in the system' reply.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not even vaguely right wing

Sure, keep telling yourself that

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are very entrenched in blame led thinking, I know very well the cause of this and many other problems but I am far more interested in improving things for the majority than wasting time with accusations.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

it is a Labour government bought and paid for by business that is trying to avoid re-nationalisation and that allows the water regulation body to be comprised of ex-water executives