this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
572 points (98.5% liked)

World News

40096 readers
2762 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mark Carney, frontrunner for Canadian Liberal Party leadership and potential prime minister, stated Canada will stand up to a bully after Trump imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports.

Carney vowed to retaliate by matching the US tariffs dollar for dollar, asserting Canada would not cave in despite mounting pressure.

He criticized Trump for undermining trade agreements, warning that the tariffs would damage the US global reputation and economic stability.

Outgoing Prime Minister Trudeau promised a forceful, immediate response, emphasizing unity as Canada defends its economic interests, ensuring national prosperity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm an expat who has been a permanent resident of Canada since 2017, and it's a horror show watching Trump receive a second term and then turn on Canada. I know his threat of invasion/buying Canada or whatever is all peacocking, but if in ten years I've been thrust back into the American healthcare system, I'll throw myself off of a bridge.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Canada won't willingly be part of the US. If the US invades Canada, it would be the end of the US.

The US gets boners over their military tech, but they weren't able to successfully occupy Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. Canada is bigger than those countries, and this would not be an overseas war where they can just go home when they fail. Americans don't have the willpower to succeed with a long drawn out occupation. They freak the fuck out over a few drones in New Jersey, they obviously wouldn't be able to handle a war on the North American continent involving drones flying over them carrying explosives and searching for targets. And that's just the tip of the iceberg of what a US war with Canada would be like.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine fighting a resistance that can just cross over the border and perfectly blend in with your population. It's madness to even suggest it even if they weren't important allies.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The whole idea is ludicrous. There are so many things that would make it utterly impossible.

  1. The border. Ignore everything else, just think about the border. The US/Canada border is the longest land border on the planet. It's utterly impossible to defend that border.
  2. Utter lack of support for the war. Even the Vietnam War enjoyed a decent amount of popular support for the first few years. Imagine starting a war that more than 50% of the population opposed right off the bat.
  3. Conflict on US soil for the first time since the Civil War. Sure, the US participated in WWI and WWII, and they were the main military force in the Korean, Vietnam, and Gulf wars. Those were all wars that happened overseas somewhere. A few thousand people died on Sept. 11th and the whole country freaked out for decades. The US psyche isn't ready for a war on US soil.

Militarily, Canada couldn't stand up to the US at all. But, the "Troubles" in Northern Ireland show what guerilla tactics can achieve, especially when it's almost impossible to distinguish the "bad guys" from the "good guys". And, that's without even talking about all the Americans who would take the opportunity to turn against their own fascist government.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would any allies be dragged in to support Canada? Could it escalate?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

There wouldn't really be any formal arrangement, because I imagine the Canadian government would fall within days. Ottawa is only a 2 hour drive from the US border, most of the Canadian population lives right next to the border. But, you could easily see various countries covertly supplying resistance cells with weapons. Most of Western Europe wouldn't do it openly because they're too vulnerable to the US. But, maybe covertly. China and Russia would definitely try to help Canadian resistance, just to destabilize the US.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Troop morale would be incredibly low, too. I would be pissed if I somehow got drafted to invade Canada. It’d be like something out of a cartoon.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would literally be asked to potentially die for the cause of betraying an ally for money. And not money for you, money for already extremely wealthy oligarchs.

[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't that most wars for the last 50 years though to be honest?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

No, just the Iraq war was like that. And even then Saddam Hussein was actually an evil motherfucker and the US tried to claim it was a war about liberation. But we know oil was a significant consideration there.

Afghanistan was about finding the terrorist that did 9/11. I'm Canadian so I have family that went over there and came back with PTSD. We were only over there because the US was our ally. Only war Canada has ever lost in it's history and it was because the US fucked it all up by going on a side quest to Iraq.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Like Russia and Ukraine, basically... But way more direct and overt.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right? Like "Bro they've got maple syrup, healthcare, and poutine. If you think I'm pointing a rifle at them instead of marching up there with a gift basket and immigration papers, you gotta be out of your mind!" Lol

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

It's inevitable though on a long enough timeline. We all know that the entire western US is literally running out of water, and eventually they're gonna want ours. I'm sure conversations have been had about how to get it, and someday it's gonna happen. When that day comes, I just pray to baby Jebus that Trump isn't the one in charge so there might be a shred of hope for a diplomatic arrangement instead of a straight-up invasion for our resources.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately you have enough people who just believe whatever their guy says. I'd think it would be like a Russia-Ukraine type thing, in the sense that a lot of friends and family are on both sides of the border, but Russia still found (and admittedly forced) enough people who didn't care.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Plus, it’d suck for at least four months a year

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The population of the US has no appetite for invading Canada, many of us have close friends and family there, we consider Canada a friend and ally and Trumps hissy fit doesn't change that.

If the US invades Canada there will be a lot of Americans aiding resistance.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Isn’t that the relationship Russia had with Ukraine when Putin took over?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not to mention the countless young adults and teenagers that still think of Canada as a saving grace, nearly utopia-esque place. Their healthcare, prison and education systems have profound impacts on the minds of young people. Or at least they did a few years ago when I was in school.

In any case, you've got a lot of people in America that would much rather fight for Canada

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t actually think the US would survive such a war. The trouble is that many states would defect. Can you imagine CA footing the bill for an invasion of Canada? Already a trade war is extremely dangerous. How easy would it be for, say NY, to sabotage the border controls?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah it would be a both a reason and an opportunity for states to secede.

There's a significant probability of that happening anyway... how long will progressive (and wealthy) states subsidize backwards and ignorant states? The whole reason why Trump is in power is because there are no consequences for significant parts of the US to be backwards thinking. If it were all separate countries the red states (red countries?) would have to become a little more progressive or they'd be living in poverty. As it is now, states like California and NYC are forced to subsidize the red states no matter how backwards they get and the red states get to force their backwards values onto the progressive states.

This is not sustainable long term. If this situation persists, it's the end of the USA. If Trump pushes things too far it only accelerates the timetable. Right now the allies of the US don't want this to happen. But those countries are no longer allies of the US and start working in the other direction then it's all over for the USA.

The US can turn things around, but there needs significant changes to reverse it's downward spiral.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I disagree, meal team six would make short work of any Canadian bacon, thus starving the Canadians into submission

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

oh, you mean the LARPing fucktards who couldn't pull off the insurrection a few years back? yeah they seem really motivated and organized

If it helps, I got your joke and commend you for it.

In these high tension times, I almost think we need a "this is a joke, please re-read if angry" tag that isn't /s or JK.

[–] moe93@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuine curiosity, why do you call yourself an “expat” instead of “immigrant”? Is there a difference?

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's the (stupid) legal term of an American who has moved abroad. Even my tax returns are done through "expat services".

[–] moe93@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wish I could be called an expat instead of an immigrant, sounds less of a stigma, lucky you. Best of luck out there!

[–] Jonnynny@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

Being an expat still comes with tax obligations to the US, no matter where you live in the world. I moved to Germany but I still have to file US taxes every year unless I renounce my US citizenship someday. That's one the most notable downsides that I can think of.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's the point. There's a pretentious implication that your priviledged when the term "expat" is used, but their just emmigrants of priviledged western nations.

Its the same with the UK "expats." When brexit first happened many UK expats were blown away that Spain was treating them like Immigrants even though they were.

You could just start telling everyone your an expat of your country of origin. I don't know if it will help you, but it certainly will make you sound more pretentious

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

That's one way of looking at it. I always perceived the distinction to be more of an intended disgrace upon ex-Americans who have left the country. "Guess you're no longer a patriot then."

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That stigma was mostly created by Americans ... They just don't want it for themselves

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

I'll throw myself off of a bridge.

But couldn't y'all set a better example by throwing anyone involved with private insurance off that bridge?