this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1710 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

29502 readers
3225 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bro put citations in his lemmy comment 💀

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

I do my best to cite any claim that I make. I would encourage others to do the same.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wish more people did that ngl 💀

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wish Boost understood the collapsible spoilers.

On my client, it's all expanded and I see all the formatting characters. It looks/works great in a browser though.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I wish Boost understood the collapsible spoilers.

On my client, it’s all expanded and I see all the formatting characters.

Ah dang, that's good to know (though I'm not sure what to do as an alternative) — I was unaware that the collapsible spoilers weren't supported on Boost. I guess that means that Lemmy's markdown formatting hasn't entirely been standardized across the service. I personally have encountered some inconsistency on the Tesseract UI with CommonMark Autolink ^[2]^ formatting where the autolinks don't even render ^[1]^.

I recommend reporting this to the Boost devs to improve Markdown feature compatibility between them and the Lemmy UI.

References

  1. "Kalcifer" @Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works. To: ["Happy #GlobalSwitchDay". @squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de. "Fediverse" !fediverse@lemmy.world. Tesseract. sh.itjust.works. Published: 2025-02-01T07:08:40Z. Accessed: 2025-02-02T04:40Z. https://tesh.itjust.works/post/sh.itjust.works/32046509.]. Published: 2025-02-01T09:20:14Z. Accessed: 2025-02-02T04:42Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16425699.
    • Raw Text:
      Signal isn't federated ^[1][2][3.1]^; it's decentralized ^[1][2][3.2]^. Though, for all practical purposes, I would generally argue that it's centralized. 
      
      
spoiler References 1. Signal-Server. signalapp. Github. Published: 2025-01-31T15:34:14.000Z. Accessed: 2025-02-01T09:24Z. <https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server>. - This is the source code for the server that Signal uses. 2. "Signal (software)". Wikipedia. Published: 2025-01-06T09:34Z. Accessed: 2025-02-1T09:30Z. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software)>. - ¶"Architecture". ¶"Servers". > Signal relies on centralized servers that are maintained by Signal Messenger. In addition to routing Signal's messages, the servers also facilitate the discovery of contacts who are also registered Signal users and the automatic exchange of users' public keys. […] 3. "Reflections: The ecosystem is moving". moxie0. Signal Blog. Published: 2016-05-10. Accessed: 2025-02-01T09:40Z. <https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/>. 1. ¶5. to ¶"Stuck in time". ¶3-6 > One of the controversial things we did with Signal early on was to build it as an unfederated service. Nothing about any of the protocols we’ve developed requires centralization; it’s entirely possible to build a federated Signal Protocol-based messenger, but I no longer believe that it is possible to build a competitive federated messenger at all. […] [interoperable protocols] [have] taken us pretty far, but it’s undeniable that once you federate your protocol, it becomes very difficult to make changes. And right now, at the application level, things that stand still don’t fare very well in a world where the ecosystem is moving. […] Early on, I thought we’d federate Signal once its velocity had subsided. Now I realize that things will probably never slow down, and if anything the velocity of the entire landscape seems to be steadily increasing. 2. ¶"Stuck in time". "Federation and control". ¶6. > An open source infrastructure for a centralized network now provides almost the same level of control as federated protocols, without giving up the ability to adapt. If a centralized provider with an open source infrastructure ever makes horrible changes, those that disagree have the software they need to run their own alternative instead. It may not be as beautiful as federation, but at this point it seems that it will have to do. :::
  • Rendered:

  • In the rendered text there are no links; however, there should be links at the end, as is shown by the CommonMark autolinks in the raw text.
  • "CommonMark Spec". John MacFarlane. CommonMark. Version: 0.31.2. Published: 2024-01-28. Accessed: 2025-02-02T04:51Z. https://spec.commonmark.org/0.31.2/#uri-autolink.
    • §6.5 "Autolinks". ¶2.

      A URI autolink consists of <, followed by an absolute URI followed by >. It is parsed as a link to the URI, with the URI as the link’s label. :::

  • [–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Same with Sync, unfortunately.

    [–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

    Dang 😕. See my comment for a related response.

    I recommend reporting the bug to the Sync devs to fix their Markdown formatting to improve feature compatibility between them and the Lemmy UI.

    [–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    That person isn’t fucking around.

    [–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    I take the issue of misinformation seriously. I try to be the change that I wish to see.