this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4200 readers
161 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm still amazed nobody made more noise about the fact she wasn't charged.

One can only possibly wonder why the usual suspects complaining about two tier policing and people getting away with crimes (even when convicted with lengthy sentences, yeah makes no sense) when they should be punished didn't seem too bothered about this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tenebrisnox 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a way checking whether an epileptic seizure has taken place? (MRI scan showing trace evidence in the brain?) If the driver has not experienced subsequent seizures, it would be difficult to accept this one without evidence.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

it would be difficult to accept this one without evidence.

Sorta not the point. We are talking about the person being accused. So reasonable doubt is in her defence.

It is down to the prosecution to either prove this is false. Or prove she had reason to know it was unsafe for her to drive.

[–] tenebrisnox 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You are right. Is a hitherto episode of epilepsy a good defence for dangerous driving in general?

I guess it could come down to whether or not the person has previous incidents of dangerous driving or they have footage or other evidence to suggest she wasn’t epileptic. If there’s no physical evidence or subsequent seizures. (I know I’m speculating and - you are right - we should assume innocence and that her account is right until shown not to be).

[–] Digestive_Biscuit 1 points 1 hour ago

If I remember correctly she said it had never happened before. It would be interesting to know whether it has happened again after and whether she has been driving a car since.

[–] MrPoletki 1 points 8 hours ago

Sure, but isn't this the sort of thing usually debated and considered at a trial?

Previously it was the CPS choosing not to prosecute.