HumanPenguin

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
1
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by HumanPenguin to c/raspberrypi@feddit.de
 

Hi. I have a CM4 and the cytron maker board.

As I can't find any cases. And only one 3d printable one. I am looking to design and print my own.

I am a beginner at all of this. But plan to use the board as a development platform for some electronics I'm building on my boat.

So my goal is to design a case that allows access to all the ports etc. While being bolted to the vesa mount of a portable monitor. So enclosable and protected when used on my lap or in rough environments.

Of course once/if finished ill share etc. I am just posting here to see if anyone has ideas or links to inspiring projects that may help me with this.

Software wise I use blender for design as I know it. But have freecad I can use to convert things etc. This is how I have an stl of the board to design around.

Edit; please excuse typos as I'm visually impaired. So Typing on a tablet is annoying difficult.

Ill also point out my spelling is crap. So its only marginly better when on a real keyboard ;) .Feel free to correct or ask if anything make interpretation difficult.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Hmm the UK just gained a free cypertruck.

They are not legal here. So one was confiscated when someone drove it in from europe.

Maybe we can give Elon some free marketing. He launches a car into space.

Maybe the UK can make a big budget video. Building a modern, carbon fibre, reusable trebuchet and launch a cybertruck into a landfill.

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Well as he founded the company. So Not really. Same staff may have done similar for other companies. But it is hard to say the people would be together with the same goals without him.

But yeah. He is little more then money and bullying. His skill is non existant. And id be suprised if much of the corperate goals to reusable space flight are actually his. Rather then folks he paid to think.

I sorta imagine him walking into a room of random smart folks and saying. How much to go to mars. And letting others work the solution.

[–] HumanPenguin -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When you are doing something for publicity.

Possibly suffer

It is at the least probably suffer.

If you are intentionally damaging property while looking for publicity. And do not expect to face legal consequences. You are seriously failing to learn from history.

In this case. The jury was specifically ordered to ignore her motive for the actions. That was what prompted the response I quoted. And this is the case in the vaste majority of crimes.

Her argument was that climate change is not a belief but a fact. Unfortunately, that is not what the court claimed. The belief they ordered them to ignore was not climate change. But her claim that her committing a crime was excusable due to the need to draw attention to it.

You may claim she expected jury nullification. And heck, she almost got it. But that in itself is what I mean by history. Jury nullification is so rare in the UK as to be almost non-existence. To expect it from property damage. Where the evidence is public and obvious is not realistic. It is a theoretical principle of over legal system. Not a defined expectation.

Comparison If you speed on the motorway. You may believe it is possible you will get a ticket. But when you do it past a speed camera that flashes. You are not being honest unless you tell the wife it's probable or pretty darn certain.

EDIT: unless you can claim someone was chasing you with a gun. Saving life has historically been an excuse for crime. But only in very direct situations.

Interesting to consider. If she filled aircraft fuel tanks with sugar. Or the jet engine equiv. Her climate change argument might be considered an excuse. As her belief that damaging the aircraft could stop the harm would be relevant.

Unlike damaging electronic signs, painting or historical documents.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Unfortunately, I do not think I'd make a good politician.

Need to find someone with a bit more personality (and less mental depression/ugly mug). To start such a group. I'd likely be a background worker.

[–] HumanPenguin -1 points 1 day ago

The law says I must kill anyone 2 shades of white below mine.

Ever wonder why laws like that don't exist.

The closest we got is prejudicial reporting laws. Germany in WW2.

But a less racist example/ Draft during the same war. Draft is the only time it has been a crime to refuse to kill. And at the time, society truly believed you had an obligation to kill for your nation. Pacifism was just seen as another word for coward.

Many people suffered prison and other punishment. For refusing to fight during the second world war. If those people were not willing to risk prison. They would have been ignored. But because many were willing to go to prison. And be forced to work mines rather than fight and kill. (PS, My grandfather brother died in those mines.)

Mining at that time was generally more dangerous than joining the soldiers. And according to my grandfather, he knew the risk when he refused to fight. For context ill add my grandfather was an engineer for smiths. So was in a protected profession. He made instrumentation for spitfires. I raise all this just to point out the discussions I had with him. As he considers himself to have grown from his brother's experience. He was angry that he was not able to fight during the beginning of the war. As was the case for many young men in protected professions in the first years. Learning of his brother, experience and death in forced labour. Made him realise and respect the sacrifice he and other pacifists made.

Other options were presented late in the war. Plus more recently. Remember the recent election. And the Tories trying to reintroduce national service. If no event like pacifists going to jail during WW2 had happened. Then the Tories would not have bothered to offer so many non-military options.

We as a society now respect the concept of pacifism because people took risk to fight for the rights not to kill. Same with mmost other modern ideals.

Women's right to vote was won by the women willing to be jailed and beaten by police. Not the people running church coffee mornings.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It does. But it can also be an advantage. When people are willing to vote on a single issue. Bigger parties fear the loss of votes more than in a proportional system.

Green never got a huge % of votes. 2MPs is the highest number (I think). But long before they had any MPs, larger parties adopted the issue rather than lose votes.

And that one I won't advertise. Forced and won a referendum with 0 MPs. I may hate their cause. But they were able to effect politics with way less votes. Than disability advocates both able and disabled exist.

I hate FPTP as far as its ability to represent the desires of a democratic society. But for single issues. It actually can help smaller populations gain a voice.

EDIT: I honestly think just forming a serious party would raise enough publicity. That the 3 big parties would panic. Despite Tories recent pre-election attack on disabled, Most voters really only notice the issues when they see it with family members. Having a couple of elections where a party is running while pointing out the broken promises plus challenging past negative attacks from political parties. Can you really see either the Tories or Labour openly disagreeing with a rational argument on this? Their options in n election will be to lie, deny intent to harm. Or ignore us.

There really is no shortage of data that can be used to gain support. And our own population alone is all we would need to scare the larger parties away from ignoring such a party.

The hardest part would be raising the money to get started. The community has no shortage of able/skilled voices. It's convincing them to fight for an agreed platform that would be difficult.

[–] HumanPenguin -3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They say ‘I do what I like without thinking about the law’. I don’t think following the law and doing the right thing are always the same thing.

And you are correct. But when you make the choice to break the law based on what is right. You also make the choice to suffer the consequences. As law is made by society. Not right or wrong.

If you believe, your actions are correct and society wrong. Then you are choosing to sacrifice to fight that battle.

And just like, a person killing a paedophile may be seen by all as right. It is still a crime of murder. Just like destroying property to make your point is still criminal damage, no matter your point. Your willingness to commit the crime is pretty worthless. If you are not also willing to suffer the punishment.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The interesting thing is. As of a 2023 report. 24% of the UK has a disability.

So even if we assume 50% of that number do not consider themselves disabled. That is still a sizable voting block.

It more a matter of actually agreeing with each other and standing up for that ideal.

Maybe it is time for a disability political party. One issue parties have managed a lot. Green. The other one I have no desire to advertise but has managed more.

We were being attacked and blamed by the last gov. And the current one is only less vocal about their actions. But def have no better plans.

Maybe it really is time to stop depending on multissue parties to stand up for our needs. And to instead make it clear for ourselves.

[–] HumanPenguin 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair evasion was harder. Due to more staff.

But it def happened. People hiding from inspectors was not uncommon.

Just like theft of all kinds. Poverty is the largest cause.

Agreed. IE privrate equity. But public services still have to survive in a society where voters and economic interests want less spending. The same voters that objwct to public spending still exist when the true left is in charge. So high taxes for corperations and high public spending will always be am issue.

Force really is the only way to sipence opposing views. They still have a voice and people still listen even when the majority disagrees.

That majority is never close to absolute in a democratic society.

[–] HumanPenguin 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

OK.

Well, as someone just about old enough to remember pre privatised rail. I will agree the Draconian nature of fare fines was less prevalent. Fines still existed. But were not used when it was obviously an error. IE wrong ticket rather than no ticket.

But more importantly, staffing was much higher. Every train had ticket inspectors. And those inspectors used their own judgement more. (Unfortunately, that judgement could lead to racism or other prejudice choices).

But honestly, while I think private rail failed in every form. I do not think the moving away from staff numbers would have been different under a public rail system. Public systems are still under pressure to reduce spending. Either to increase revenue to the government or reduce cost.

So honestly, I don't see the fines or motivation to skip fares, being any different under a nationalised rail system in the modern era. Folks still skipped fares under nationalised rail. It's just genuine errors were rarer, due to lack of automation.

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

more of a service issue at heart. Rail

Please explain. Music piracy many argued was because the industry restricted access. So piracy was better service. I am not sure how rail fare evasion is similar.

(and all infrastructure) should not be privately owned

Agreed. But it does seem current plans are to get us much closer to that. As the gov is replacing all contacts with coops or the new gov owned rail. As they expire by 2027.

[–] HumanPenguin 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Universe's longest needle dick.

32
Boat work update. (self.3dprinting)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
 

EDIT: Update and pic in comments:

Hey folks. I posted a while back asking for some advice on a future purchase.

To sum up. My brother and I are visually impaired and retired through that.

We have purchased a tiny 25ft narrowboat between us we use to travel around the UK.

And as our vision is getting worse (we will likely lose it eventually). I have some major electrical work planed this year to make thing easy for us to maintain.

So I was looking for advice on nylon printing. Yep it has to be nylon. Because some of this stuff needs to sit over the tiny hot engine plus alternator and survive diesel splashes amd bilge water etc while supporting electronics.

But some here also pointed out petg will work when. The heat is less high. So thanks.

This is just an update that i have just had the printer etc delivered.

I have a Neptune 4 pro with a tent and vent system to keep temprature and fumes safe stable.

I have a 70c filament dryer and plan to print Descicant hokder to be placed in spools with lids that hold hydrometers. This and some vacuum bags should allow storing the petg and nylon easyer. Then Microwaving the stuff when the meters are above 25%

Also those desicant holders look worth adapting somehow for the boat.

So now I need to replan my workshop to make setting all this up and using it easy vision wise. That will take a good few days.

This is basically a thank you for your help in the past and a "Hi ill be posting the mess I make learning how to get this workjng over the next few months. "

Thanks guys all the best

 

Sorry, this is not really 3d printing related. But as we have some cool folks here OS wise. I hopped you could help or point me the correct way.

As I have mentioned before my brother and I own a tiny narrow boat we are doing up.

The engine room is a nightmare. 4ft high with no top access. We are disabled (visual and flexibility basically old can't bend and classed as blind but some vision. ) So we have difficulty measuring exact space in a room we have to crawl through. Well it's very like Star Trek Jeffries tubes but greasy. ;)

We need to plan and mount electronics in there to support our use. (I sought advice on printing to help with this a while back and got fantastic help)

I am now starting to think having a 3d model of the engine room would make working out the layout much easier. So here is where advice is needed.

We are skint (poor for the US) so spending 1000s ain't an option. And likely not worth it anyway.

I have heard of android apps that use photographs. And that level of accuracy is likely fine for our planning needs.

But I'm a Linux 100% user. Since the late 90s So need some way to do this that can be done on Linux and fed into FreeCAD and or Blender.

Does anyone know much about tools in this space. And what the process for doing this with photographs is?

24
Newbe advice (self.3dprinting)
 

I have never used a 3d printer. But have done a little research.

Be great if someone could confirm my intention is sane.

I have loads of Linux experience so my plans relate to open source all the way.

First off I am brassic(poor). So looking cheap all the way. My brother and I have a tiny narrowboat we are refitting. And plan to use the printer for stuff within the boat.

Due to this printing PA6 to go in the bilge is important. (Diesel and water bad for most other plastics)

As we are both vision impaired and old. The idea is most of the electrical mountings etc will be self designed and painted to make future access quick and easy with our rapidly worsening vision.

So my plan. I am looking at a elegoo Neptune 4 pro.

Because it is cheap but great value. Uses kipper. And seems easy to modify as I grow in use. Also supports temps needed for PA6 etc.

But I will need an enclosure to work with PA 6 and a dryer.

Dryer is cheap not an issue.

But I'm thinking of a tent enclosure. Some good well insulated ones on amazon for £50 with hose to vent out smells.

Will one of these tents be suitable for keeping temperature stable while printing PA6. And can anyone offer other advice for cheap solutions to make this easy.

On a related novice front.

Gue to the vision. One of the projects is to print mounting boards for din rail fuses etc. The idea being to mix colours.

Ie flat surface faces from and back in white. The the inner support fram in a bright colour. This will mean holes to support thumb screws etc for easy low vision future maintainance. IE easy to find the pre set screw holes.

This plan means I can swap colours when printing layers so should be easy without over (for me) briced multi head printer.

But can anyone share experience with doing this with nylon. IE how dose delays in printing the layers while swapping filament t effect the linking of those layers.

As I say complete novice o the actual doing this so any advice will be helpful.

 

Was watching the kings' speech on BBC. While the interviewed members of the 3 leading parties.

Amazing that the Tory member can make claims with no challenge. Specifically.

We will ensure labour stick to their promise not to raise taxes. (paraphrased)

They have claimed this throughout the election. Without labour or the media questioning it.

The actual promise.

Labour will not increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. (cut and paste from labour.org.uk)

This is not a promise to not raise taxes. It is about very specific taxes that generally affect the poorest more. Corp taxes capital gains etc are still free. But It seems intentional that Tories choose to ignore that.

Also, intentional that labour do not choose to publicly disagree.

Some claim about the nationalisation of rail costing a fortune.

While he included GB energy and others that do have some cost. He very openly attacked rail as the main cost.

This really needs challenging. Since privatisation, the government has spent way more inflation adjusted running the pseudo privatised gift to the shareholders. Then national rail ever cost. Nothing has improved since rail was privatised. (honestly safety has but due to modern standards not privatisation).

Nothing labour has promised is a cost sink. Yes, as company contracts end, the gov will need to take over running costs. But as we are already funding huge chunks of that cost now. The argument that nationalisation of rail is expensive is crap.

The more honest analysis is the Labour Party has little in the way of plans to fund needed improvements.


As much as I hate to admit, it's not going to happen.

The only reason to have the BBC is so that capital interests do not take over all UK media. And it really seems like the BBC no longer has that mantel.

Yes, the Tories worked hard to do this over the last 14 years, and the number of folks deciding the licence is no longer worth it. While hard to blame them, def has not helped.

But I can't help but wonder how we replace it. In 2024 how do we go about creating some form of a real news and current affairs channel that is free from commercial interests. Free from bias is going to be harder. Free from perceived bias impossible. Most consider the truth to have bias if it disagrees with their objective view.

33
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Hi. I've not really used Windows since the early 2000. Even then not much.

I have a single mini PC with windows on. And use it only for device firmware updates. As a ham radio nerd. You get many devices that can only be modified via windows.

Anyway it was set up with dual boot the normal way. Windows first as it came with it. Then make a real Linux partition to use the PC on my boat while travelling.

Now the issue is I am upgrading the Mini PC. Basically replacing memory and the tiny 128gb ssd. So need to install it all from scratch.

I have order a copy of windows 11 from ebay. (At a price I consider acceptable for the crap)

But its going to take several days to arrive. And I would like to be more efficient.

So I am hoping folks can advice me on the best way to set up the PC with Linux first then install Windows 11 later. Knowing windows has a habit of messing up grub etc.

106
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/uk_politics
 

This is opinion. So read it as such. But consider it please.

Obviously if you read this based on the title. I assume you oppose the Tories.

But if you are wondering why labour are so keen to manage expectations. There is a reason.

Campaign funding wise the Tories are estimated to be 19m ahead of labour. But honestly at the moment they are not spending a huge amount more.

We know the Tories are skilled at election manipulation. So there is genuine fear that the Tories plan to launch a campaign within the last few days.

I.E. when there is less time and funding to ensure fact checking is effective.

They know Starmer is more publicity aware then Corbyn was. He is able to play it in a way that dose not scare traditional Conservative voters.

They also know thanks to Boris, that the courts are unable to punish them for outright lies during any political campaign. And that Rishi is prepared to lie about and accuse civil servants of lying when challenged.

As huge as polling is against the Tories. All it would take is some dramatic claim against the party or Starmer. To convince Tory traditional voters to bite their tongue and vote Tory. While convincing left wing voters not to vote or to switch to 3rd party in seats where labour are the 1st or 2nd party.

The fact we know they have a huge amount of money unspent. Makes it clear they plan to launch something nearer the end of the election. And the only advantage of leaving it so late. Is it will limit the ability of the party to effectively react. Or fact checkers to be able to prove and distribute evidence of lies.

Please be prepared for this.

 

I cannot really see any other way to interpret this interview.

Remember this when looking at their attitude to protest etc.

20
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/uk_politics
 

TLDR at the end I just post how I propose to convince the new parliament.

If polling is anything near to close. Starmer will enter parlimemt on the 5th with a landslide majority.

Time for us to remember the court case PM Johnson won for the 350m lie on a bus. The high Court simply stated.

Parliment has made no law banning lies during a campaign.

Well we really do have an opportunity to convince Starmer to change that. With Sunak and Co clearly following the last elections lead. Lieing about the civil service backing up their cost estimates.

It is time parliment tried to build confidence in election claims. This would only be practical when it comes to provable falsehoods of fact. Such as the claims made about Starmers campaign. After they have been informed the civil service did not analyse the data they used.

Unfortunately forcing a party to follow its manifesto is not really doable. And if parliment made the law. The next parliment would cancel it.

How to convince Starmer et al

OK so most will remember back in the coalition. The new government claimed to want to be responsive. So they set up an official, way for the public to request parliment do things. Resulting in parliment responding with crappy excuses every single time 10k signatures. Or a dumb argument in committee at 100k.

Now consider a new majority land slide parliment. Walking into government on July the 5th. With a social media publicised request to make it illegal for election campaigns, to continue to publish claims known to be false.

Its a simple law. If your party has received evidence that your clai is false. You must stop using it or face legal punishment.

So assuming 10k votes. The new government would need to write a response claiming they think lieing is OK.

Pretty sure the electorate can eviserate them on social media after that. Changing their mind. The new tory opposition leader. (Or Lib Dem maybe?). Would sure as he'll leap on the new government for such a claim.

But honestly to get the response needed. 100k signatures and the parliment required to have a public committee debate on their right to lie in campaigns.

No new government with a huge majority is going to be willing to face that.

Help

If you have read this far. You will recognise, I am not great at grammar and my wording is not consise. So when it comes to writing the partition on the parliment website. Someone more skilled would be best. Or a discussion here as to the best wording etc.

Do please if this idea seem worth while. (Let's face it what have we to lose. A few mins a day signing a partition and posting to social media over the election. )

Then please join a discussion here. To try to push this idea forward over the next month.

25
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/uk_politics
 

Seriosly. When you lie in a way that make the civil service look biased. You have losf all respect for the position you are trying to win.

Can any history geeks think of a time when a UK pilitician has been publically accused of falsely represeting the civil service.

67
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by HumanPenguin to c/uk_politics
 

Yesterday I was pointing out how little effort this would take based on polling. And today a new poll puts electoral calculuses tory seat prediction from 66 to 27.

While it is an early poll.

Honestly if we saw a higher young voter turn out all votiing tactically. A complete distruction of the Tories party is possible.

Imagin an opposition party challenging labours view on FPTP. This would be a real once in a life time change to the old aristocratic power structure.

view more: next ›