this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
148 points (85.9% liked)

Technology

61456 readers
4730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
148
A massive battery fire in California could cast a dark shadow on clean energy expansion (www.fastcompany.com)
submitted 1 week ago by RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Days before President Donald Trump returned to the Oval Office and took actions to stall the transition to clean energy, a disaster unfolded on the other side of the country that may have an outsize effect on the pace of the transition.

A fire broke out last Thursday at the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility in California, one of the largest battery energy storage systems in the world. The fire raged through the weekend, forcing local officials to evacuate nearby homes and close roads.

Battery storage is an essential part of the transition away from fossil fuels. It works in tandem with solar and wind power to provide electricity during periods when the renewable resources aren’t available. But lithium-ion batteries, the most common technology used in storage systems, are flammable. And if they catch fire, it can be difficult to extinguish.

Last week’s fire is the latest and largest of several at the Moss Landing site in recent years, and I expect that it will become the main example opponents of carbon-free electricity use to try to stop battery development in other places.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This place has caught fire several times now?

Seriously not a good look for the industry if events like this keep happening.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As opposed to all the leaking oil pipelines, petroleum fires, leaking methane, etc? No, this place has a pretty poor track record, but let’s not make it “the industry”.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -3 points 1 week ago

I'm talking about the renewable energy industry, smart person. It's a very bad look for them as a whole having multiple large fires at one location.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago

Moss Landing uses NMC batteries instead of LiFePO4. NMC lithium batteries are more energy dense (they're often used in long range EVs), but they can also produce hydrogen and can autoignite if they go into thermal runaway. LiFePO4 batteries cannot autoignite and can't produce hydrogen. They last longer, and the reduced density is worth it for the safety benefits, which is why more recent grid storage setups use them and not NMC. A BESS using the right chemistry could not have gone up in flames like this.