this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
152 points (100.0% liked)
traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns
1130 readers
179 users here now
Welcome to /c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns, an anti-capitalist meme community for transgender and gender diverse people.
-
Please follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct
-
Selfies are not permitted for the personal safety of users.
-
No personal identifying information may be posted or commented.
-
Stay on topic (trans/gender stuff).
-
Bring a trans friend!
-
Any image post that gets 200 upvotes with "banner" or "rule 6" in the title becomes the new banner.
-
Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.
-
When made outside of NSFW tagged posts, comments about dysphoria/traumatic/transphobic material should be spoiler tagged.
-
Arguing in favor of transmedicalism is unacceptable. This is an inclusive and intersectional community.
-
While this is mostly a meme community, we allow most trans related posts as we grow the trans community on the fediverse.
If you need your neopronouns added to the list, please contact the site admins.
Remember to report rulebreaking posts, don't assume someone else has already done it!
Matrix Group Chat:
Suggested Matrix Client: Cinny
https://rentry.co/tracha (Includes rules and invite link)
WEBRINGS:
๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ Transmasculine Pride Ring ๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ
โฌ ๏ธ Left ๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Be Crime Do Gay Webring ๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Right โก๏ธ
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't this just conceptually kicking the can? The definition of a group isn't 'belonging to the group' you would still have to explain what defines that group? Obviously it can't be 'producing the x reproductive cell' since that status is not innate or immutable. They're clearly even aware of this, it's funny that this is the best they've got.
Also isn't this legally creating people who have no sex or people who technically are multiple sexes?
They're not sending their best, folks.
Genuinley how do they even prove this? Like my ex is interesex, assigned female at birth but produces (a small ammout of non-functional) small gametes, like what even are they occording to this law? and how would they even know that from legal documents alone?? Like being assined a sex at birth is the only thing on the books, but even that doent always alighn with the gametes you will produce (or already have) at birth. Def some can kicking going on...
Their argument for your ex-partner by them is that they're a minority of a minority so it doesn't matter.
I've heard this from conservatives verbatim. When you point out how intersex and trans people are both more common than redheads, they just dismiss it as "Well that's still a tiny number of people."
Or in other words "My argument makes sense if you just ignore all the things that prove it wrong."
"Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words..."
Yeah exactly, I unfortunately know intimately their disgusting beliefs.
Also to be a pedant, how would they know what was the case "at conception"? Is this phenomenon normally documented by a competent observer?
that part is just insane bullshit for thier anti-abortion ideology i think. Like nobody has any gametes right at conception right??? Literally makes no sence