this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
40 points (85.7% liked)
Movies & TV
23064 readers
41 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't appreciate that tone. Her accepting her sexuality ends in her having sex with what you call the "embodiment of male sexual domination" and then they both die. How does that make sense? It seems like everyone save the men loses out from her accepting her sexuality. And I don't think it's very coherent how the movie shows that sexual desire cannot be controlled – except via marriage – because that has murderous consequences, which can, however, also be resolved through sexual desire. I just don't feel like the metaphors here work together and that is what I meant by "incomprehensible".
To put it more clearly: In the Eggers films I've seen, every woman either ends up dead or part of a childremoved cult and I don't think women who suffer are automatically a sign of feminist politics.